Ripple founders disagree on political views

A recent political donation has spotlighted a growing divide in the political views of Ripple's top executives, signaling that even within the leadership of one of the most prominent cryptocurrency companies, political unity is far from guaranteed. Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen recently made headlines by donating $10 million worth of XRP to support U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris's campaign for the 2024 presidential election.
This bold political move has highlighted differences in political stances among Ripple's founders, particularly between Larsen and CEO Brad Garlinghouse.
Larsen's donation, one of the largest contributions in support of Harris's campaign, came with a call for a fresh approach to cryptocurrency regulation. He expressed concern about the current state of U.S. regulatory policies on digital assets, suggesting that a Harris presidency could foster a more progressive stance on cryptocurrency issues. Larsen has been vocal about the need for clear and supportive regulations to ensure that the U.S. remains competitive in the global digital economy. His political donation appears to align with his broader push for regulatory reform that could benefit the crypto industry.
On the other hand, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has taken a more neutral political stance. Although Garlinghouse has not opposed Larsen's contribution, he has avoided aligning Ripple or himself with any particular political figure or campaign. Garlinghouse’s position reflects a more cautious approach, focusing on building Ripple's reputation as a leader in blockchain technology without entangling the company in the complexities of U.S. political discourse. His stance suggests a desire to keep Ripple's operations above partisan lines, especially in a political environment where the regulatory future of cryptocurrencies remains uncertain.
Loading...
This difference in political strategy has sparked discussions within the cryptocurrency community. While some support Larsen’s active engagement in U.S. politics, hoping it will lead to favorable regulatory outcomes, others appreciate Garlinghouse’s more restrained approach, which emphasizes neutrality and focuses on Ripple's core business operations.
As the U.S. prepares for crucial elections in 2024, Ripple's co-founders will likely continue to face questions about the company's political positioning. The differing views of Larsen and Garlinghouse could come to reflect broader debates in the industry about how crypto firms should engage with the political landscape.
Whether other industry leaders will follow Larsen’s example or choose Garlinghouse’s neutrality remains to be seen as the 2024 U.S. elections approach.
Let us recall that Ripple is preparing to launch its own stablecoin platform. During the XRP conference in Las Vegas, Ripple CTO David Schwartz caught the attention of the crypto community by hinting that the company's stablecoin would launch in June.
Read also: Chainlink launches private blockchain transactions for institutional сlients