Online Trading Starts Here
EN /scam-or-safe/rheinisch-westflische-grundbesitz-ag-review/
AR Arabic
AZ Azerbaijan
CS Czech
DA Danish
DE Deutsche
EL Greek
EN English
ES Spanish
ET Estonian
FI Finnish
FR French
HE Hebrew
HI Hindi
HU Hungarian
IND Indonesian
IT Italian
JA Japan
KK Kazakh
KM Khmer
KO Korean
MS Melayu
NB Norwegian
NL Dutch
PL Polish
PT Portuguese
RO Romanian
... Русский
SV Swedish
TH Thai
TR Turkish
UA Ukrainian
UZ Uzbek
VI Vietnamese
ZH Chinese

Is Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag Safe or Scam?

Editorial Note: While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners. Here's an explanation for How We Make Money. None of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer.

What is known about Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag at the moment?

Rheinisch-Westfälische Grundbesitz AG, also known as WGF AG, was a German investment company specializing in real estate assets and mortgage bond issuance. Founded in 2003 and headquartered in Düsseldorf, the firm expanded rapidly through the issuance of property-backed bonds. However, it faced increasing scrutiny over its financial disclosures and bond ratings. In December 2012, the company filed for insolvency under self-administration, and in 2016, it entered full insolvency proceedings. Investigations revealed serious mismanagement, including the deliberate harm of corporate assets. While not originally a scam, the company ultimately collapsed under the weight of financial misrepresentation and internal failures. Legal cases concluded by 2020, and the company is no longer operational.

Company name Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag
Foundation date 2003
Registration address Düsseldorf, Germany
Operating geography Germany
Specialization investment
Regulation ⚠️ Scam
Contacts
N/A
N/A

TU Expert Advice: “I do not recommend Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag

Anton Kharitonov
Anton KharitonovFinancial expert and analyst at Traders Union

I have been working in the financial services market for a long period of time and consider myself an expert in safe investing. I can note that Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag demonstrates the following characteristics:

  • Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag is not regulated by a Level 1 regulator.
  • Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag is not regulated by a Level 2 regulator.
  • Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag is not regulated by a Level 3 regulator.
  • The company is either registered offshore or its registration number cannot be confirmed through official online databases.
  • The information about the Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag’s management is either absent or unreliable.

I recommend completely disregarding any mentions of such companies and refraining from doing business with them and its affiliate bodies. If you are already a client of such a company, immediately explore all options for getting your money back, up to filing a complaint with the financial oversight authorities and courts.

I recommend choosing only reliable and verified partners for trading on financial markets. You can use our 'Find my broker' tool for this purpose.

Which sources were utilized to evaluate the security of Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag?

The following information was used for the analysis and assessment of Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag reliability:

  • Registration details and information on licenses of brokers, financial companies, and their subsidiaries are published on their official websites.
  • Information from regulators' registries, including warnings, comments, and publications by regulators.
  • Data from analytical portals, including reviews, complaints, and claims filed by traders.

The latest database update: July 04, 2025.

Avoid Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag as it is not regulated at all

It is worth noting that regulatory oversight alone is not a guarantee of the safety of your funds, as the regulatory body overseeing the broker plays a crucial role in this regard. The higher the level of the license, the higher the safety of money. We divide all licenses into three levels:

Level 1 jurisdictions (high level of trust):
USA
CFTC
CFTC
Switzerland
FINMA
FINMA
UK
FCA
FCA
Australia
ASIC
ASIC
Ireland
CBI
CBI
Japan
JFSA
JFSA
Singapore
MAS
MAS
New Zealand
FMA
FMA
Canada
IIROC
IIROC
Hong Kong
SFC
SFC

Why do you need to trust these regulators?

They have strict requirements for license acquisition including a minimum capital of $125,000, a mandatory physical office, participation in a compensation fund, and compliance with financial discipline rules like KYC. Regulators also enforce stringent control over client account segregation, conduct annual audits of broker financial statements, and monitor operational transparency.

Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag is not regulated by a Level 1 regulator.


Level 2 jurisdictions (medium level of trust):
Cyprus
CySEC
CySEC
South Africa
FSCA
FSCA
China
CBRC
CBRC
India
SEBI
SEBI
Israel
ISA
ISA
Thailand
SECT
SECT
United Arab Emirates
DFSA
DFSA

Why are these jurisdictions less reliable?

Have lenient registration conditions, minimal oversight of account movements, and no requirement for full client verification. Periodic superficial checks on licensee activities are conducted.

Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag is not regulated by a Level 2 regulator


Level 3 jurisdictions (low level of trust):
Belize
FSC
FSC
British Virgin Islands
FSC
FSC
Mauritius
FSC
FSC
Vanuatu
VFSC
VFSC
The Bahamas
SCB
SCB
Bermuda
BMA
BMA
Cayman Islands
CIMA
CIMA

Which factors make these regulators less safe?

Licenses issued by these regulators are primarily formalities aimed at attracting financial flows to their jurisdiction, resulting in minimal information disclosure and control requirements.

Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag is not regulated by a Level 3 regulator.


Why do we have the expertise to assess the reliability of Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz/ Ag?

Over the years of working with the analysis of financial companies, Traders Union has accumulated a significant knowledge database. Our analysts know how to distinguish scams from reliable companies. Every month, we publish important insights on this topic.

Top Techniques Used by Scammers (July, 2025)
Guaranteed High Profits and Persuasion: Scammers convince traders that they use unique tools to make money. They often exploit human weaknesses, such as the desire to earn quickly with minimal effort.
Time Limit: Scammers present their offers as unique opportunities, often claiming that only 100 people can take advantage of them, and you are one of them. You have only 10 minutes to agree, or you miss your chance. Usually, such offers are scams.
Phishing: Scammers use links that direct you to their websites. After you provide your personal information on these websites, scammers receive it. Victims lose access to their user accounts, emails, wallets, and bank accounts.

Conclusion Don’t be too quick to trust everything you read. Avoid making hasty decisions. Try to be skeptical. Don’t follow unknown links, especially those that come via messengers or email.

This tool will help you choose a legal broker in your country

We have reviewed over 3,800+ different financial companies operating worldwide to provide you with reliable and up-to-date information on licensed brokers.

Advantages of working with licensed brokers:

Legal Protection: Protects your investments.

Reliability: Ensures honesty and transparency.

Risk Minimization: Reduces fraud risk.

Financial Stability: Verified brokers.

Find the best broker for me

We constantly monitor the Internet for the emergence of new fraudulent schemes to deceive traders. We have been collecting data about scam brokers for more than 10 years and we think we know every dishonest company in the market. Below we have collected for you the information about the scammers from the List of SCAM Brokers.

Be careful and cooperate with the trusted brokerage companies only.

Should you identify any inaccuracies on this page or possess additional information about this broker, we kindly request you to inform us.

Team that worked on the article

Andrey Mastykin
Author, Financial Expert at Traders Union

Andrey Mastykin is an experienced author, editor, and content strategist who has been with Traders Union since 2020. As an editor, he is meticulous about fact-checking and ensuring the accuracy of all information published on the Traders Union platform. Andrey focuses on educating readers about the potential rewards and risks involved in trading financial markets.

He firmly believes that passive investing is a more suitable strategy for most individuals. Andrey's conservative approach and focus on risk management resonate with many readers, making him a trusted source of financial information.

Also, Andrey is a member of the National Union of Journalists of Ukraine (membership card No. 4574, international certificate UKR4492).

Chinmay Soni
Developmental English Editor

Chinmay Soni is a financial analyst with more than 5 years of experience in working with stocks, Forex, derivatives, and other assets. As a founder of a boutique research firm and an active researcher, he covers various industries and fields, providing insights backed by statistical data. He is also an educator in the field of finance and technology.

As an author for Traders Union, he contributes his deep analytical insights on various topics, taking into account various aspects.

Mirjan Hipolito
Cryptocurrency and stock expert

Mirjan Hipolito is a journalist and news editor at Traders Union. She is an expert crypto writer with five years of experience in the financial markets. Her specialties are daily market news, price predictions, and Initial Coin Offerings (ICO).