24.12.2024
Mirjan Hipolito
Cryptocurrency and stock expert
24.12.2024

Binance challenges SEC lawsuit as allegations fail Howey test

Binance challenges SEC lawsuit as allegations fail Howey test The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the cryptocurrency industry

​Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, and its founder Changpeng "CZ" Zhao have filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against them by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The motion argues that the SEC has failed to substantiate key allegations, including those related to the classification of certain transactions as investment contracts under the Howey test, Coingape reported.

The Howey test is a legal standard used to determine whether a transaction qualifies as a security. Binance’s legal team contends that the SEC did not adequately demonstrate how specific transactions met the criteria outlined in the test. Additionally, the motion questions the SEC’s claims against third-party tokens and its request for disgorgement.

Allegations against Binance under scrutiny

Binance and Zhao assert that the SEC has not provided a clear distinction between tokens classified as securities and those treated as commodities, such as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH). The motion criticizes the SEC for failing to define "investment contracts" in the context of cryptocurrency, arguing that this ambiguity undermines the case.

The lawsuit also involves allegations that Binance failed to register as a securities exchange and facilitated unregistered securities trading. However, Binance claims that the SEC’s arguments lack sufficient legal grounds and factual support to proceed.

Potential implications for crypto regulation

The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the cryptocurrency industry, particularly in defining how digital assets are regulated under U.S. securities law. Binance’s motion underscores the ongoing tensions between regulators and the crypto sector, as exchanges and issuers seek greater clarity on compliance requirements.

As the legal battle unfolds, the court’s decision on the motion to dismiss will be closely watched, potentially setting a precedent for future regulatory actions in the crypto space.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.