Online Trading Starts Here
EN /
AR Arabic
AZ Azerbaijan
CS Czech
DA Danish
DE Deutsche
EL Greek
EN English
ES Spanish
ET Estonian
FI Finnish
FR French
HE Hebrew
HI Hindi
HU Hungarian
IND Indonesian
IT Italian
JA Japan
KK Kazakh
KM Khmer
KO Korean
MS Melayu
NB Norwegian
NL Dutch
PL Polish
PT Portuguese
RO Romanian
... Русский
SV Swedish
TH Thai
TR Turkish
UA Ukrainian
UZ Uzbek
VI Vietnamese
ZH Chinese

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness - Fees Review Included

Editorial Note: While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners. Here's an explanation for How We Make Money. None of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer.

Choosing the best trading platform means looking at fees, market conditions, and how reliable the broker is for long-term trading. When assessing Trading 212 and IC Markets, traders should compare factors like execution speed, spreads, and available markets. A well-researched Trading 212 and IC Markets comparison shows traders how these platforms compare in terms of costs, market access, and ease of trading.

For those analyzing broker feedback, looking at Exness and IC Markets reviews gives insight into what each platform offers. IC Markets is often recognized for its ECN execution and competitive spreads, while Exness, by contrast, attracts traders who prefer high leverage and flexible account structures. Traders considering these options should carefully weigh their features to find the best fit.

Similarly, feedback from Exness and Trading 212 reviews highlights the different strengths of each broker. Exness appeals to those who want diverse account types and high leverage, whereas Trading 212 is a strong choice for traders who prefer commission-free stock and CFD trading. Comparing the strengths of each broker allows traders to pick the one that best fits their trading style. Also offers to compare Exness and OctaFX.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness
FeatureTrading 212IC MarketsExness
Overall3.94.74.7
Regulation4.554.8
Fees3.54.94.8
Trading assets4.74.63.9
Investment instruments14.94.1
Platforms and charting tools2.84.44.2
Deposit and withdrawal4.14.64.6
Research3.74.34.7
Education3.84.44.8
Support3.94.64.5
Bonuses12.53.1
Open an accountOpen an account
Your capital is at risk.
Open an account
Your capital is at risk.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: pros and cons

The Trading 212 brokerage company (trading212.com) was registered to do business in London in 2006. Its specialization is the provision of services for investment and active trading in the foreign exchange and stock markets. The company is regulated and licensed by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and by CySEC in Europe. The broker does not provide data on awards received during the work.

IC Markets Trading Company was founded in 2007 in Sydney, Australia. The broker is licensed under the Australian Financial Services License (AFSL) and the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC). The broker is also a member of the Australian Financial Complaint Authority (AFCA), the governing body that sets the industry standard for the resolution of disputes between consumers and financial service providers, and regularly undertakes audits.

While both brokers have strong regulatory backgrounds, traders often compare their advantages and drawbacks. When analyzing the pros and cons of IC Markets and Trading 212, key differences emerge in fees, trading assets, and platform features. IC Markets is known for its low spreads and ECN execution, making it a popular choice for professional traders, whereas Trading 212 attracts investors with commission-free stock trading and a user-friendly interface. Each broker caters to different trading styles, so the choice depends on individual preferences and strategies.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: pros and cons
Trading 212IC MarketsExness
Overall pros
  • Low level of the minimum deposit

  • A large selection of trading assets

  • Big choice of stocks and ETFs

  • UK and EU regulated broker

  • World biggest Forex broker, over 180,000 clients and $1.11 trln monthly turnover

  • Advanced ECN trading

  • Order execution speed 40 mc

  • Free VPS

  • Trading servers in New York and London

  • Strong regulation

  • 2000+ trading assets, 60+ currency pairs

  • EUR/USD average spread 0.1 pip

  • Trading with leverage up to 1:2000

  • Big choice of ECN/STP accounts

  • Low trading and non trading fees

  • Free VPS hosting

  • Quotes history

Overall cons
  • Lack of investment programs

  • A small number of ways to contact support

  • The company does not hold contests for traders

No Forex bonuses
  • Not a big choice of trading assets

  • No Forex bonuses

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: safety and regulation

When choosing a broker, regulation is a crucial factor in ensuring security and transparency. Both Exness and IC Markets are regulated by multiple authorities, including ASIC and FSA, which helps protect traders and enforce strict compliance measures. This level of oversight makes Exness and IC Markets reliable choices for those seeking well-regulated trading environments.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: safety and regulation
Regulated By:Trading 212IC MarketsExness
Max. regulation levelTier-1Tier-1Tier-1
Investor protection€20,000 £85,000€20,000€20,000
FCA UK regulationYesNoNo
FINRA (U.S)NoNoNo
BaFinNRA (Germany)NoNoNo
ASIC (Australia)YesYesYes
CFTC (U.S)NoNoNo
MASNoNoNo
FSCA SANoNoNo
BVI FSCNoNoNo
VFSCNoNoNo
FSA (Seychelles)NoYesYes

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: trading conditions

When comparing IC Markets with Exness, traders will find that both brokers provide access to MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, ensuring a familiar trading environment. However, for those looking for more advanced charting tools and automation features, IC Markets, through its integration with the Exness platform, also supports cTrader. This platform is widely used by professional traders who rely on algorithmic strategies and customizable indicators. Meanwhile, Exness sets itself apart with its MultiTerminal feature, making it a great choice for traders managing multiple accounts efficiently.

For traders evaluating deposit requirements, the differences between IC Markets and Trading 212, especially when it comes to the minimum deposit, are significant. While Trading 212 allows users to start trading with as little as £1 or €1, IC Markets, which caters more to serious traders, requires a minimum deposit of $200. This contrast makes Trading 212 an appealing option for beginners who want to start with a small amount, whereas IC Markets provides access to tight spreads and professional trading conditions.

When it comes to adding funds, the Exness and IC Markets deposit process is structured to accommodate different trader preferences. Those who prefer a lower financial commitment may find Exness deposits attractive, as they start at just $1. On the other hand, IC Markets deposits, which require a higher initial investment, provide traders with access to a more sophisticated trading environment. Both brokers support a variety of funding methods, making it convenient for traders across the globe to deposit and start trading.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: trading conditions
Trading ConditionsTrading 212IC MarketsExness
Minimum deposit£1, €1$200$1
Trading platformsWeb platform, a mobile app for iOS and AndroidMT4, MT5, cTraderMT4, MT5, MultiTerminal
Max leverage (futures)1:30 (retail clients), 1:500 (Pro clients)1-5001-2000
Supported marketsCurrency pairs, CFDs on stocks, indices, futures, commodities, ETFsForex, futures, CFDs on indices, commodities, metals, stocks and bondsCurrencies, assets of stock and commodity markets, cryptocurrencies
Trading assetsover 12,000 stocks and ETFs available in the Invest/ISA accounts and over 5,000 leveraged instruments in the CFD account 2000+100+
Trading accountsTrading 212 Invest, Trading 212 CFD, ISA (available for UK clients)cTrader, Raw Spread, StandardStandard, Standard Cent, Standart Plus, Raw Spread, Zero, Pro
Base account currenciesGBP, EURUSD, AUD, GBP, CHF, JPY, NZD, SGD, CAD, HKD, BTCUSD

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: fees

When analyzing the fees associated with Exness and Trading 212, traders should look at both commission charges and the cost of spreads before making a decision. While Trading 212 is known for commission-free trading on stocks and ETFs, Exness offers tight spreads, which makes it appealing to those who trade Forex frequently. For traders who place multiple trades daily, Exness can be a budget-friendly option due to its low-spread accounts, whereas Trading 212 is better for long-term investors who want to avoid additional costs. A detailed breakdown of Exness and Trading 212 fees can help traders compare which platform offers the best value for their trading style.

For those considering an account with either Exness or IC Markets, the decision depends on trading preferences and goals. IC Markets, which operates on an ECN pricing model, allows traders to access raw spreads and execute trades directly within the market, making it ideal for scalpers and high-frequency traders. Meanwhile, Exness, with its variety of account types, including Standard, Raw Spread, and Zero accounts, gives traders more options based on their risk tolerance and trading approach. Comparing the features of an Exness and IC Markets account allows traders to see which broker fits their budget, trading speed requirements, and available assets.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: fees
FeeTrading 212IC MarketsExness
Standard acc. spread EUR/USD, min pips0,20,80,8
Standard acc. spread EUR/USD, max pips0,51,01,0
ECN commission1,53,53,5
ECN spread EUR/USD0,10,10,1
Deposit fee, %NoNoNo
Withdrawal fee, %NoNoNo
Withdrawal fee, USDNoNoNo
Inactivity fee, $NoNoNo

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: trading assets

For traders exploring platforms like Trading 212 along with Exness, these platforms differ mainly in the assets they offer and how they approach trading. While Trading 212 is designed for long-term investors with access to a broad selection of stocks and ETFs, Exness, in contrast, works well for traders who focus on trading in the Forex and CFD markets. If your priority is building a diverse portfolio, Trading 212 offers multiple asset classes, whereas Exness provides flexible trading conditions that cater to those engaged in Forex and speculative trading.

When looking at Forex trading on platforms such as Trading 212, along with IC Markets, they differ in spreads, execution speed, and the trading tools they offer. Traders who need low spreads and fast order execution often prefer IC Markets, which gives traders fast execution speeds and low spreads, which work well for scalping and algorithmic trading. Meanwhile, Forex trading through Trading 212 is commission-free, which appeals to traders who prefer a straightforward, cost-effective approach.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: trading assets
Asset NameTrading 212IC MarketsExness
Overallover 12000+2000+ trading assets100+ trading assets
ForexYesYesYes
StocksYesYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)es
MetalsYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)es
CryptocurrenciesYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)es
EnergyYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)es
IndicesYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)es
ETFsYesYes (CFD)esNo
BondsYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)esNo
Mutual fundsNoNoNo
Stock optionsNoNoNo
Futures tradingYes (CFD)esYes (CFD)esNo
Binary optionsNoNoNo

Trading 212 or IC Markets or Exness: investment programs

When evaluating Exness and IC Markets investment programs, traders can explore various options tailored to different trading styles and risk levels. IC Markets offers MAM/PAMM accounts, allowing experienced traders to manage multiple accounts efficiently, while Exness provides a strong copy trading service for those looking to follow professional traders. These investment programs give traders flexible ways to participate in the market, whether through direct account management or automated strategies.

Trading 212 or IC Markets or Exness: investment programs
Asset NameTrading 212IC MarketsExness
Copy tradingNoYesYes
MAM/PAMMNoYesNo
Managed accountsNoNoNo
OtherNoNoNo

Trading platforms: Trading 212 or IC Markets or Exness

When evaluating the IC Markets and Exness trading experience, the type of platform each broker offers plays a crucial role in a trader’s decision. Both brokers provide access to MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, making them suitable for those who depend on advanced charting tools and automated trading strategies. However, IC Markets, in addition to these standard platforms, also includes cTrader, a system preferred by traders who seek an intuitive interface and a smooth ECN trading experience. On the other hand, Exness, rather than relying solely on third-party solutions, offers its own platform, which integrates seamlessly into its broader trading environment.

For traders comparing Trading 212 with Exness, the ideal trading experience depends on individual preferences regarding asset types and platform functionality. Trading 212, with its commission-free model, is designed for investors who prioritize simplicity and cost-efficiency. Meanwhile, Exness, offering a different approach, focuses on traders who require access to higher leverage and more flexible trading conditions. Because these platforms serve distinct trading styles, it is essential to evaluate their features carefully to find the one that best aligns with your financial goals.

Trading platforms: Trading 212 or IC Markets or Exness
Trading 212IC MarketsExness
MT4NoYesYes
MT5NoYesYes
cTraderNoYesNo
Appropriate platformTrading 212IC Markets terminalExness terminal
OthersNoNoNo

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: deposit and withdrawal methods

When assessing how withdrawals work on Trading 212 and Exness, traders will find that both brokers provide reliable options, but the exact withdrawal process varies based on speed and available payment methods. While Trading 212 offers bank transfers and card withdrawals without any additional fees, Exness, on the other hand, provides a wider range of choices, including e-wallets, which can be more convenient for those who prefer instant transactions. Selecting between the two brokers depends on whether a trader values no-fee withdrawals or the ability to access funds quickly.

When looking at the minimum deposit requirements for IC Markets and Trading 212, it becomes clear that each broker targets a different type of trader. Those using Trading 212 can start trading with as little as £1 or €1, making it a beginner-friendly platform, while traders opting for IC Markets will need to meet the higher minimum deposit requirement of $200. This difference means that IC Markets, with its professional-grade trading conditions, appeals to traders willing to commit more capital, whereas Trading 212 is a more accessible choice for those testing the waters with smaller investments.

For traders evaluating funding methods on Exness and IC Markets, both brokers provide multiple ways to deposit funds, ensuring flexibility across different payment systems. With Exness, traders can start with as little as $1, making it one of the most accessible brokers, while IC Markets, which requires a higher deposit, justifies this with access to raw spreads and ECN execution. The decision between the two ultimately comes down to whether a trader prioritizes a low entry point or enhanced trading conditions with more advanced market access.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: deposit and withdrawal methods
Deposit and Withdrawal MethodTrading 212IC MarketsExness
Bank WireYesYesYes
Bank CardYesYesYes
NetellerNoYesYes
BTCNoNoNo
WiseNoNoNo
PayoneerNoNoNo
USDTNoNoNo

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: research

For traders analyzing Exness and IC Markets research types, both brokers offer comprehensive market insights to support informed trading decisions. IC Markets provides fundamental and technical analysis, including economic news and market updates, while Exness enhances its research offerings with detailed reports and trading ideas. These research tools are crucial for traders who rely on data-driven strategies and market analysis to improve their performance.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: research
Research TypeTrading 212IC MarketsExness
News feedNoYesYes
Fundamental dataNoYesYes
Chart analysisYesYesYes
Trading ideasNoYesYes
E-Mail reportsNoYesYes

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: education

When analyzing the differences between Exness and IC Markets in terms of which broker is better for beginners, it’s clear that both provide useful educational resources, but they cater to different learning styles. Exness, for example, offers a cent account, which allows new traders to practice with very small amounts of capital, making it a safer way to gain experience. Meanwhile, IC Markets focuses on building a solid foundation by offering structured webinars and in-depth articles, helping traders who want a more technical and detailed introduction to Forex trading. As a result, the decision between Exness vs IC Markets for beginners largely depends on whether a trader values hands-on experience with low risk or a more structured educational approach with professional insights.

For those evaluating education resources available at Trading 212 and IC Markets, the key difference lies in the depth of content and accessibility. Trading 212, for instance, simplifies the learning process by offering video tutorials and a demo account, making it easier for new traders to get started. However, IC Markets, when it comes to education, provides a more structured learning experience with live webinars, fundamental analysis insights, and technical strategy guides. This makes IC Markets a more suitable option for traders who want an in-depth understanding of market movements, while Trading 212 appeals more to those who prefer a simplified and hands-on introduction to trading.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: education
Education TypeTrading 212IC MarketsExness
Demo-account/paper tradingYesYesYes
WebinarsNoYesYes
ArticlesNoYesYes
VideosYesYesYes
Cent accountNoNoYes

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: support

When evaluating IC Markets and Trading 212 support services, traders will notice key differences in availability and communication channels. IC Markets offers a broader range of contact methods, including phone support, live chat, and email, making it easier for traders to resolve issues quickly. Trading 212, on the other hand, primarily relies on email and a feedback form, which may result in longer response times for urgent inquiries.

For traders seeking fast and convenient assistance, Exness and Trading 212 live chat options are an important factor to consider. Exness provides a real-time chat feature, allowing traders to get immediate responses to their questions, while Trading 212 currently does not offer live chat support. This difference makes Exness a more favorable choice for traders who prioritize quick and efficient customer service.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: support
Support FeaturesTrading 212IC MarketsExness
Working days24/724/524/5
E-mailYesYesYes
PhoneNoYesYes
Online chatNoYesYes
Otherfeedback formNoNo

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: Forex bonuses and promo

When evaluating bonuses available through Trading 212 and IC Markets, traders should keep in mind that neither broker includes the usual Forex deposit bonuses. However, IC Markets, instead of direct cash rewards, provides a structured affiliate program where traders can earn commissions by referring new users. Meanwhile, Trading 212, rather than offering deposit-based bonuses, gives new users and their referrals free stock shares. For traders who regularly refer to others, these alternative perks can still offer good value.

For those looking at the promotions and offers provided by Exness and Trading 212, there are notable differences between the two brokers. Exness, compared to Trading 212, offers a more attractive affiliate commission system, allowing partners to earn a portion of the trading commissions from their referrals. Trading 212, however, focuses more on stocks, incentivizing users with stock-based rewards. In contrast, Exness caters to Forex traders who prefer commission-based earnings through referrals. The best choice depends on whether a trader prefers stock rewards or a commission-based referral program.

Trading 212 vs IC Markets vs Exness: Forex bonuses and promo
PromoTrading 212IC MarketsExness
Forex bonusNoNot offeredNot offered
Affiliate programPromo offer. It works according to the principle of a standard referral program. A client of the company becomes a partner of a broker, receives an individual referral link and attracts new users to the company. The referrer gets a bonus for each new active trader. Trading 212 provides a tiered referral program that rewards every client and friend they refer with a free share (or a share of the whole share) up to €100/GBP. % of trading commissions40% of trading commissions

Conclusion

When comparing IC Markets, Exness, and Trading 212, each broker caters to different trader needs. IC Markets is ideal for professional traders seeking low spreads and advanced platforms. Exness stands out with high leverage, flexible accounts, and instant withdrawals. Trading 212 is best for beginners and stock investors due to its commission-free trading and user-friendly interface. While IC Markets and Exness offer strong Forex trading conditions, Trading 212 provides a simpler investment approach. Choosing the right broker depends on your trading style, preferred assets, and platform features.

FAQs

What should I start Forex trading with?

It is desirable for novice traders to explore trading using a demo account to learn the market and how to work on the trading platform without the risk of suffering losses. At the same time, it is advisable to review the educational materials of the broker, learn trading basics. Then you can deposit the minimum required amount to perform a small number of transactions. If you manage to close several months in a row in the black, without substantial drawdowns on the account, then you can try increasing your deposit. Also trying to copy trades automatically is a good option for a start.

What amount should I start trading with?

The minimum deposit of $10 may be enough to trade on the cent account. However, for trading on Standard/ECT accounts, experts recommend starting with at least $200-500. With this amount, you can use not a very big leverage. Remember, getting carried away with the margin is the main cause of losses among beginners.

What should I take into consideration when choosing a broker?

Experts recommend looking at the broker’s reliability first and foremost. The other important features include basic trading conditions, commissions and fees, customer reviews. If brokers are approximately the same in terms of basic criteria, you need to choose based on your experience and tasks. One broker may be good for professionals and another – for novice traders.

Is it possible to be scammed by a broker with a license from a reputable regulator?

In theory, yes. But in practice, it takes so much time and money to comply with the requirements of reputable regulators that it is not worth it for scammers to bother obtaining a legitimate license.

Related Articles

Team that worked on the article

Rinat Gismatullin
Author and business expert

Rinat Gismatullin is an entrepreneur and a business expert with 9 years of experience in trading. He focuses on long-term investing, but also uses intraday trading. He is a private consultant on investing in digital assets and personal finance. Rinat holds two degrees in Economy and Linguistics.

Chinmay Soni
Developmental English Editor

Chinmay Soni is a financial analyst with more than 5 years of experience in working with stocks, Forex, derivatives, and other assets. As a founder of a boutique research firm and an active researcher, he covers various industries and fields, providing insights backed by statistical data. He is also an educator in the field of finance and technology.

As an author for Traders Union, he contributes his deep analytical insights on various topics, taking into account various aspects.

Mirjan Hipolito
Cryptocurrency and stock expert

Mirjan Hipolito is a journalist and news editor at Traders Union. She is an expert crypto writer with five years of experience in the financial markets. Her specialties are daily market news, price predictions, and Initial Coin Offerings (ICO).