Online Trading Starts Here
EN /interesting-articles/is-bitcoin-4year-cycle-dead/
AR Arabic
AZ Azerbaijan
CS Czech
DA Danish
DE Deutsche
EL Greek
EN English
ES Spanish
ET Estonian
FI Finnish
FR French
HE Hebrew
HI Hindi
HU Hungarian
HY Armenian
IND Indonesian
IT Italian
JA Japan
KK Kazakh
KM Khmer
KO Korean
MS Melayu
NB Norwegian
NL Dutch
PL Polish
PT Portuguese
RO Romanian
... Русский
SQ Albanian
SV Swedish
TG Tajik
TH Thai
TL Tagalog
TR Turkish
UA Ukrainian
UR Urdu
UZ Uzbek
VI Vietnamese
ZH Chinese

Is Bitcoin’s 4-Year Cycle Dead?

Editorial Note: While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners. Here's an explanation for How We Make Money. None of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer.

Bitcoin’s traditional 4-year cycle – driven by halving events that cut new coin issuance – may be fading as institutional capital reshapes market behavior. Analysts note that halvings now have a smaller effect on supply, while ETFs and macroeconomic factors exert greater influence on price movements. Instead of repeating predictable boom-and-bust patterns, Bitcoin appears to be evolving into a more mature, liquidity-driven asset whose performance increasingly mirrors global financial markets.

Throughout the history of the crypto market, everything has tended to move in four-year cycles around Bitcoin’s halving events. This is a preprogrammed aspect of bitcoin’s issuance policy where the amount of new bitcoin created every 210,000 blocks, which comes out to roughly every four years based on the targeted ten-minute block time, is cut in half.

Notably, this aspect of bitcoin’s monetary policy tends to control the movements of the entire crypto market rather than just bitcoin itself. While other crypto assets have their own internal dynamics at play, they still tend to follow the lead of the world’s first and largest cryptocurrency when it comes to longer-term trends.

For example, Ethereum (ETH) performed rather poorly in the lead up to the finalization of its move to proof-of-stake in September 2022, despite the deflationary effects the change was going to have on the ETH asset itself. This should have been viewed as a positive development for ETH’s supply dynamics, but the bitcoin bull market had ended after peaking around $69,000 in November 2021 and brought the rest of the crypto market down with it as it eventually fell below $20,000 one year later – around the time of crypto exchange FTX’s bankruptcy filing.

With all that said, there are many analysts who now agree that the four-year crypto cycle that has been centered around Bitcoin’s halving events is coming to an end. This is due to two main contributing factors: the halvings themselves are less impactful on bitcoin’s rate of issuance and the institutional money that has entered the market is simply too overwhelming.

Halvings are less impactful

The issuance rate of new bitcoin declines over time, but that rate has already declined quite substantially from the early days. Bitcoin’s rate of issuance was astronomical when the crypto network first launched, as was required for an asset going from zero to a few million units in a matter of years. After settling down to roughly 10% in the early 2010s, the annual rate of issuance has now fallen below 1% for the first time after the most recent halving in April 2024.

Bitcoin Annualized Monetary Supply Inflation Rate (%), Data source: Jameson LoppBitcoin Annualized Monetary Supply Inflation Rate (%), Data source: Jameson Lopp

In the past, Bitcoin halvings have caused supply shocks on the market, as the amount of new bitcoin being generated by miners was cut in half overnight. However, the actual change in the issuance rate also declines over time. The first halving cut the amount of new bitcoin created in each block by 25, while the most recent halving only saw a decline of 3.125 bitcoin. Additionally, that smaller cut in issuance is also measured against a further expanded supply of existing bitcoin.

Notably, the magnitude of each major bitcoin bull cycle up to this point – with local tops hit in 2013, 2017, 2021, and 2025 – has been smaller than the previous cycle’s, as bitcoin has followed a process of diminishing returns. Additionally, the most recent halving was the first time the bitcoin price had hit a new all-time high prior to the halving event (rather than in the months that followed it).

Month Minimum Price, $ Average Price, $ Maximum Price, $
July 2026 19 20 20
August 2026 20 20 20
September 2026 21 21 22
October 2026 21 21 21
November 2026 22 22 23
December 2026 20 20 21

Institutional money has entered the market

On top of the halving dynamics, much larger amounts of money are now affecting bitcoin price movements, especially with the introduction of the Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the U.S. According to data from The Block, the U.S.-based ETFs now account for roughly 25% of spot bitcoin trading volume. BlackRock’s iShares BitcoinTrust (IBIT) has been the main driver of institutional demand, holding more than $90 billion worth of bitcoin in its fund.

Spot Bitcoin ETF Volumes Spot Bitcoin ETF Volumes

The scale of institutional money that has entered the market dwarfs the kind of money that used to be associated with the sector, which provides greater levels of liquidity and makes it more difficult for one entity to move the price in either direction.

Now that bitcoin is more closely associated with traditional markets, it’s clear that the whims of these institutional players and macroeconomic considerations will have more say over the bitcoin price than the cryptocurrency’s own supply dynamics. These altered dynamics enabled by bitcoin ETF approvals in the U.S. were explained in a report from Coinbase prior to the most recent halving event.

As Bitcoin increasingly integrates with global financial markets, access to reliable trading platforms becomes an important consideration for both retail and institutional participants. Liquidity, trading fees, available derivatives, and security standards can significantly affect trading efficiency and risk management. The comparison below highlights several cryptocurrency exchanges where investors can trade Bitcoin and other digital assets under competitive conditions.

Best crypto exchanges
Kraken Coinbase OKX Nebeus Crypto.com

Demo account

No No Yes No No

Coins Supported

278 249 329 30 250

Min. Deposit, $

10 10 10 5 1

Spot leverage

1:5 1:3 1:10 1:Not available 1:3

Spot Maker Fee, %

0.25 0.5 0.08 Not available 0.25

Spot Taker fee, %

0.4 0.5 0.1 Not available 0.5

TU overall score

8.7 8.46 8.44 7.84 7.24

Open an account

Go to broker
Your capital is at risk.
Go to broker
Your capital is at risk.
Go to broker
Your capital is at risk.
Go to broker
Your capital is at risk.
Go to broker
Your capital is at risk.

What happens next?

To be clear, whether the four-year cycles are over for bitcoin is still unknown, as this current cycle has yet to reach its final stages. That said, market observers should have a better grasp on whether the four-year cycle will continue or if there is a “new normal” by the end of the year. In the previous three cycles, the bull market reversed course in the last quarter of the calendar year in rather dramatic fashion.

While some have theorized that a collapse in the digital asset treasury (DAT) company market could cause a sharp reversal in bitcoin’s upward trajectory this time around, there has yet to be much sign of trouble in that sector up to this point.

As indicated by a new joint report from Checkonchain and Unchained, it’s still possible bitcoin could rise much further from its current price level around $120,000; however, it’s less clear if the usual mania will occur in the closing months of the year or if a slow and steady rise could continue beyond the usual four-year window.

Investors should stop fixating on the calendar and start focusing on liquidity cycles

Anastasiia Chabaniuk Educational Content Editor

As someone who has followed Bitcoin’s evolution for over a decade, I believe we’re entering an entirely new phase – one defined less by programmed scarcity and more by global capital flows. The four-year cycle was a product of Bitcoin’s adolescence: a simple feedback loop between halving events, media attention, and retail speculation. That rhythm worked when liquidity was thin and narratives drove sentiment. But today, the market’s heartbeat is set by different forces – interest rate policy, ETF inflows, and institutional allocation strategies.

From my perspective, investors should stop fixating on the calendar and start focusing on liquidity cycles and risk appetite across global markets. Bitcoin has effectively become a macro asset, and its price behavior will increasingly mirror the same patterns that govern equities, bonds, and gold. This doesn’t mean the halving is irrelevant – it still affects miner economics and long-term supply – but its role as a timing mechanism for bull and bear markets is fading.

If I had to make a forward-looking call, I’d say we’re heading into an era where Bitcoin trades more like digital gold than a speculative tech bet. Price growth may become steadier, less explosive, but also more sustainable. Those expecting another “post-halving moonshot” might be disappointed, but those who adapt to this structural maturity will likely find greater stability – and potentially longer-term opportunity – in the years ahead.

Conclusion

The era when Bitcoin’s price action was dictated by its rigid 4-year halving cycle may be coming to a close, as institutional investors and ETFs introduce fresh forces to the market. With each halving appearing to wield less influence, recent surges and corrections now often correlate more closely with institutional activity—such as spot ETF approvals—than code-driven supply shocks. This shift challenges long-held assumptions and signals that market participants must adapt, analyzing broader financial flows and sentiment over simplistic cycle predictions. Ultimately, Bitcoin’s future may depend less on mathematical inevitability and more on its adoption by mainstream capital, redefining what drives the digital gold’s value in a new era.

FAQs

How have liquidity cycles started to influence Bitcoin’s price movements?

Liquidity cycles, driven by the flow of capital from both institutional and retail investors, have become a key factor influencing Bitcoin's price. As global market liquidity expands or contracts based on factors like interest rates and macroeconomic policy, Bitcoin’s price increasingly reacts in tandem with other major assets, reducing the dominance of its programmed supply schedule.

What are the implications of Bitcoin behaving more like a macro asset?

As Bitcoin takes on characteristics of a macro asset, its price movements align more closely with traditional financial instruments such as equities and gold. This means broader economic factors, like monetary policy and institutional portfolio strategies, are becoming more significant drivers of price than internal crypto-specific events like halvings.

How might miner economics be affected as halving events become less impactful?

With halvings now having a smaller effect on Bitcoin’s overall supply, miner revenue from block rewards is decreasing at a slower and less dramatic rate. While miners must still manage costs and efficiency, their earnings are influenced more by transaction fees and prevailing market prices, especially as new issuance represents a shrinking portion of overall rewards.

What changes should investors consider in their approach as Bitcoin transitions to a mature market?

Investors may need to adapt by focusing less on fixed events like the four-year halving cycle and more on indicators of global liquidity, risk sentiment, and macroeconomic conditions. Navigating this maturing market may require greater attention to factors influencing institutional flows and less reliance on simple cyclical patterns from Bitcoin’s earlier years.

Editors' Top Picks and Insights

Team that worked on the article

Kyle Torpey
Author at Traders Union

Kyle began exploring Bitcoin in 2013, when public interest in cryptocurrencies was just beginning to grow. At first, it was more of a hobby.

Dan Blystone
Senior English Editor

Dan Blystone began his trading career in 1998 as an arbitrage clerk on the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). He later traded bond and Eurex futures at proprietary firms such as Altea Trading, gaining valuable experience in high-frequency trading and risk management.

Chinmay Soni
Head of Fact-Checking Department

Chinmay Soni is a financial analyst with more than 5 years of experience in working with stocks, Forex, derivatives, and other assets. As a founder of a boutique research firm and an active researcher, he covers various industries and fields, providing insights backed by statistical data.

Glossary for novice traders
Index

Index in trading is the measure of the performance of a group of stocks, which can include the assets and securities in it.

Cryptocurrency

Cryptocurrency is a type of digital or virtual currency that relies on cryptography for security. Unlike traditional currencies issued by governments (fiat currencies), cryptocurrencies operate on decentralized networks, typically based on blockchain technology.

CFD

CFD is a contract between an investor/trader and seller that demonstrates that the trader will need to pay the price difference between the current value of the asset and its value at the time of contract to the seller.

Leverage

Forex leverage is a tool enabling traders to control larger positions with a relatively small amount of capital, amplifying potential profits and losses based on the chosen leverage ratio.

Bear market

A bear market is a period of time in which an investment asset, such as stocks, bonds, or commodities, experiences a decline in price for an extended period of time.