IMF concludes program design review, backs targeted lending reforms
The International Monetary Fund is advancing changes to its lending framework after assessing how its programs performed through a period of repeated global shocks between 2018 and 2024. The review supports phased reforms aimed at making IMF-supported programs more realistic, adaptable and effective in resolving members' balance of payments problems.
Highlights
- On September 14, the IMF Executive Board concluded the 2026 Review of Program Design and Conditionality, proposing refinements to improve program effectiveness and responsiveness to shocks.
- The IMF reform package includes stronger macro-financial assumptions, risk-informed baselines, systematic external sector assessments, and a pilot Medium-Term Structural Reform Strategy for sequencing conditions.
- The implementation will proceed in phases with updated guidance and tools, focusing on proportionality, risk, and minimal administrative burden for lower-capacity countries within the existing IMF budget.
Review findings and reform priorities
As reported by the International Monetary Fund, its Executive Board concluded the 2026 Review of Program Design and Conditionality on September 14 in Washington, assessing programs under the General Resources Account and the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust. The review examines how IMF-supported arrangements functioned during the COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical conflicts and broader economic uncertainty, and it proposes refinements to improve program design and implementation.The IMF says Fund-supported programs responded quickly to successive shocks, helping member countries meet urgent financing needs and avoid excessively sharp pro-cyclical adjustment. It also finds that medium-term external viability remains difficult to restore in some cases, particularly where shocks recur, vulnerabilities are entrenched or implementation falls short.
The reform package keeps the existing framework anchored in the 2002 Guidelines on Conditionality while seeking more coherent and adaptable program design. Directors broadly support measures including stronger macroeconomic and financing assumptions, closer attention to implementation capacity, more systematic use of external sector assessments, risk-informed baselines, contingency planning and a pilot Medium-Term Structural Reform Strategy to better sequence structural conditions.
Implications for member countries and IMF operations
Board members say a more uncertain global environment increases the need for timely adjustment, credible financing strategies and reforms that support growth and resilience. They stress that IMF financing should support, not replace, policy adjustment, and that programs should remain tightly focused on resolving balance of payments problems and restoring medium-term external viability.Directors also back more systematic tracking of performance against original targets, clearer corrective actions when performance criteria are missed and a more risk-based approach to debt exposure monitoring. They support more candid end-program assessments and changes to the framework for longer-term IMF engagement, while cautioning against stigmatizing follow-on arrangements driven by repeated shocks or prolonged structural challenges.
Implementation is set to proceed in phases, beginning with updated operational guidance and new analytical tools and templates for country teams before broader country-level rollout. Directors say the approach should remain proportionate and risk-based within the existing budget, while limiting administrative burdens for lower-capacity members and aligning with related institutional reviews.
Our earlier article covered the expected departure of ECB Executive Board member Isabel Schnabel ahead of her term ending, as she was set to take up a senior role at the IMF’s market department. We noted that her exit would open an unexpected vacancy at the ECB and add uncertainty around monetary-policy leadership at a time when investors are highly sensitive to rate and financial-stability signals.