U.S. crypto sector faces regulatory opening after Clarity setback

Traders Union
All News
Crypto
U.S. crypto regulatory shift

Highlights

The collapse of Clarity in the Senate shifts crypto regulatory momentum to the SEC and CFTC, accelerating agency proposals and exemptions for blockchain trading and custody.
The SEC's five-year 'Innovation Exemption' (Sept 17) enables tokenized U.S. stock trading via blockchain, while the CFTC launches a public process (Oct 5) on leveraged retail crypto trading and new registration standards.
Industry leaders expect agency action to drive mergers and token buybacks, but legal experts warn only Congressional legislation can deliver comprehensive, durable regulation and resolve key jurisdictional gaps.

Agency moves reshape the rulemaking path

As reported by CoinDesk, the collapse of Clarity in the Senate redirects oversight momentum to the SEC and CFTC, with both agencies already advancing proposals and exemptions that could expand blockchain-based trading and custody. Interviews with executives and legal specialists point to broad agreement that regulation continues to move forward, even as views differ on whether agency action can offer a stable long-term foundation.

Lev Breydo, an assistant professor of law at William & Mary Law School, says Clarity exposes divisions within the industry, including over ethics provisions and the yield dispute with community banks. He expects the SEC in 2027 to concentrate on completing offering and custody rules and to build on its tokenized-stock exemption, while the agencies' March joint interpretive release serves as an important base for coordination under existing law.

The SEC's five-year "Innovation Exemption," introduced on September 17, lets qualifying venues trade tokenized U.S. stocks through blockchain liquidity pools while permanent rules are developed. The CFTC follows on October 5 by seeking feedback on rules for leveraged retail crypto trading and on a new registration category for crypto markets, beginning what is likely to be a lengthy public comment and rulemaking process rather than immediate implementation.

The SEC's October 1 custody proposal would also allow state trust companies to safeguard client crypto and would permit advisers and funds to hold those assets themselves under certain conditions. Still, ordinary, unleveraged spot trading remains without comprehensive federal oversight beyond the CFTC's anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority, leaving open one of Clarity's central unresolved issues.

Commercial gains face durability questions

Some executives see the legislative setback as a possible catalyst for faster commercial progress. Paul McCaffery, head of digital assets at investment bank KBW, says proactive SEC and CFTC action is helping unlock a wave of mergers and acquisitions across digital assets, traditional financial services and fintech.

Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan says the agency-led approach appears more favorable in the short term than legislation that would require years of follow-up rulemaking. He also expects more protocols to adopt token buybacks, especially buy-and-burn models, after SEC clarification that he says gives investors more confidence.

Developers and market operators are also watching how regulators draw lines between software creation and financial intermediation. Cathy Yoon, chief legal officer at Solana-focused research and development firm Temporal, says she hopes the SEC recognizes developers as software creators without treating their work as a securities enterprise, while Michael Lie, global head of digital assets at Flow Traders, says comprehensive regulation is inevitable as finance moves toward 24/7 trading.

Legal experts, however, warn that implementation remains the hardest part. Kevin Kreuser, general counsel at domain-name tokenization firm D3, says tokenized real-world assets need clearer jurisdictional boundaries, and Breydo says only Congress can provide a comprehensive framework with statutory durability. Hougan adds that Clarity's failure may preserve a regulatory moat for Coinbase, Kraken and other incumbents by delaying competition that could lower costs.

Our earlier article on the Philippine SEC’s proposed revisions to the Green Equity label outlined how the regulator plans to tighten oversight by shifting application approvals and ongoing compliance monitoring to stock exchanges under SEC supervision. It also noted that the updated framework would keep key eligibility thresholds, introduce annual independent reassessments, and aim to give investors a clearer, more credible basis for evaluating listed companies’ environmental claims.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.