Buterin’s new vision: Why Ethereum wants to become digital gold

​Ethereum has long been valued for what its blockchain can do. Now, a different question is gaining attention: Can ETH become a reliable store of value? The answer may depend on more than supply and demand.

Ethereum's fee-burning narrative loses its appeal

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has challenged one of the cryptocurrency's most familiar investment arguments. In a November 8 post on X, he suggested that ETH should be valued as a store of value rather than primarily as a token whose price benefits from burning transaction fees.

View post on X Loading...

The tweet was deleted by the author.

But we saved everything 🙂.

Ethereum introduced fee burning through the EIP-1559 upgrade in 2021. The mechanism removes part of each transaction fee from circulation, potentially reducing ETH's supply when network activity is high. It helped popularize the idea of ETH as ultrasound money, an asset whose supply could decline over time. However, Ethereum burned approximately 1.48 million ETH in 2022, compared with just 19,200 ETH between January and early November 2026. Lower transaction fees and activity shifting to layer-2 networks have reduced the amount burned.

Buterin acknowledged the weakness of this argument: “ETH as fee-burning token never was as strong as it seemed.” He warned that maximizing fee revenue could require expensive development and more interventionist governance, potentially undermining decentralization. Instead, he emphasized censorship resistance, privacy, security, and the network's ability to survive technological disruption.

The Ethereum Classic split raises questions about decentralization

Buterin's vision of ETH as a store of value raises questions about how predictable Ethereum's rules really are, particularly when influential figures advocate changing them. A controversial decision in 2016 offers an important precedent.

In June that year, hackers exploited a vulnerability in The DAO, an investment project built on Ethereum, diverting approximately 3.6 million ETH. The incident presented a difficult choice: Should blockchain transactions remain irreversible even when a major exploit threatens investors?

Ethereum's leading developers proposed an intervention to recover the funds. In July, the network underwent a hard fork that moved the affected assets into a recovery contract. The decision followed a community vote, although only a small fraction of ETH holders participated.

Some miners and users rejected the intervention and continued operating the original chain, which became Ethereum Classic (ETC). The split exposed a fundamental disagreement over blockchain immutability. Supporters argued that recovering stolen funds justified an exceptional intervention, while critics believed changing the rules undermined the principle that transactions should be irreversible.

Buterin played a central role in advocating the intervention and shaping Ethereum's response to the crisis. His support helped build momentum for the hard fork, which ultimately required other network participants to adopt the changes. The episode demonstrated the considerable influence Ethereum's co-founder could exercise over major decisions affecting the blockchain. More than a decade later, Buterin remains a leading figure in shaping the network's technical direction.

Why Bitcoin has a stronger claim to digital gold

Bitcoin and Ethereum were designed for different purposes. Bitcoin primarily serves as a decentralized monetary asset, while Ethereum supports smart contracts, decentralized applications, stablecoins, and tokenized financial products. These differences also shape their monetary policies and governance.

Bitcoin's supply is limited to 21 million BTC under its current consensus rules, with new issuance declining through scheduled halvings. Independent node operators enforce these rules, and changing them would require broad acceptance across the network. Ethereum has no fixed maximum supply. Its monetary policy combines new issuance with transaction-fee burning, allowing supply to increase or decrease depending on network conditions.

The networks also differ in how they evolve. Ethereum has undergone major upgrades, including fee burning in 2021 and its transition from proof of work to proof of stake in 2022. Bitcoin's development has generally been more conservative, with proposed changes facing extensive scrutiny. Its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, has not participated publicly for more than a decade, whereas Buterin remains a prominent voice in Ethereum's development.

Bitcoin is not immune to disputes. Its scaling disagreements led to the creation of Bitcoin Cash in 2017, demonstrating that competing groups can split over protocol changes. However, Bitcoin's monetary rules have remained comparatively stable. Ethereum's flexibility encourages innovation but creates greater uncertainty about future changes to its economic model.

Can Ethereum become digital gold without losing its identity?

Ethereum's role in financial infrastructure continues to expand. Its blockchain supports stablecoins, decentralized lending, and tokenized investment products. ETH also serves several purposes within this ecosystem, including paying transaction fees, securing the network through staking, and providing collateral in decentralized finance.

Financial institutions are exploring tokenized securities and blockchain-based settlement, potentially creating new demand for Ethereum's infrastructure. However, greater network adoption does not necessarily mean stronger demand for ETH. Layer-2 networks reduce transaction costs, while some applications generate relatively little direct demand for the token.

Buterin's continued influence presents another challenge. His proposals can shape discussions about protocol upgrades and monetary policy, even though their implementation requires broader support. For investors seeking a reliable store of value, such concentrated influence raises concerns about the predictability of Ethereum's rules.

Ultimately, ETH does not need to replicate Bitcoin to remain valuable. Its success may depend on supporting a growing financial ecosystem rather than maintaining an unchanging monetary model. But if Ethereum wants to compete with Bitcoin as digital gold, investors will need confidence that its governance can protect monetary predictability and resist intervention even when changing the rules appears beneficial.