North American regulated utilities ranking highlights investment-grade split in S&P Global review

North American regulated utilities ranking highlights investment-grade split in S&P Global review
Utilities ranking split revealed

S&P Global Ratings has published a ranking of North American regulated utility companies it rates, using credit ratings, outlooks and internal risk assessments as the basis for the list. The review is not a rating action and reflects ratings and scores as of Nov. 1, 2026, separating investment-grade companies from speculative-grade peers under different ordering criteria.

Highlights

  • S&P Global Ratings released a ranked list of North American regulated utilities by credit criteria including rating, outlook, and risk profiles.
  • The ranking differentiates investment-grade (BBB- or higher) and speculative-grade (BB+ or lower) utilities based on stand-alone, business, and financial risk profiles.
  • The snapshot, based on ratings as of Nov. 1, 2026, does not indicate rating actions but offers investors comparative credit insights within the utility sector.

Ranking criteria and methodology

As reported by S&P Global Ratings, the list orders North American regulated utility companies by rating, outlook, stand-alone credit profile, and business and financial risk profile assessments.

For investment-grade companies rated BBB- or higher that share the same rating and outlook, the ranking first considers stand-alone credit profile, then business risk profile, and then financial risk profile. If those factors do not differentiate issuers, companies are listed alphabetically.

For speculative-grade companies rated BB+ or lower with the same rating and outlook, the sequence changes after stand-alone credit profile, with financial risk profile taking precedence over business risk profile before any alphabetical ordering is applied.

Implications for utility credit comparisons

The ranking provides a structured comparison of rated regulated utilities across North America, giving investors and industry participants a way to distinguish credit quality within the sector without signaling any immediate change in ratings.

Because the document explicitly states that it does not constitute a rating action, the list serves as a snapshot of relative positioning under S&P Global Ratings' existing criteria rather than a new credit decision. The scores and ratings cited in the report are current as of Nov. 1, 2026.

Our earlier coverage of Hainan Rubber’s proposed subordinated perpetual sustainable securities explained how the planned refinancing is structured through Halcyon Agri and why the notes were rated below the issuer level due to subordination and coupon-deferral features. We also outlined the key factors behind the rating view, including the group’s high leverage, liquidity position, and the role of implied state support in maintaining funding access.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.