The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Cathie Wood, chief executive of ARK Invest, has renewed her bullish stance on Bitcoin, advising investors to consider reducing exposure to gold in favor of the world’s largest cryptocurrency. In a February 2026 interview, Wood said Bitcoin’s structural advantages could propel it to $1.5 million by 2030, a forecast that has reignited debate across traditional and digital asset markets.
Her comments came as gold prices surpassed $5,000 per ounce, while Bitcoin remains volatile.
Wood described Bitcoin as “digital gold,” emphasizing its fixed supply of 21 million coins. Unlike gold, which continues to be mined and added to global reserves, Bitcoin’s issuance schedule is predetermined and capped by code. That scarcity, she argues, gives it long-term appreciation potential as adoption expands.
According to Wood, the combination of limited supply and growing demand could create a powerful supply-demand imbalance. She has previously outlined scenarios in which institutional allocation to Bitcoin increases steadily over the coming years, particularly as investors seek alternatives to traditional stores of value, Coinfomania reports.
ARK Invest projects that global asset managers could allocate between 5% and 10% annually toward Bitcoin adoption over time. Even modest portfolio shifts by pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and corporations could significantly affect price dynamics, given Bitcoin’s capped issuance.
Wood pointed to rising institutional participation — including spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds and corporate treasury strategies — as a central driver of future price growth. Companies such as MicroStrategy have accumulated substantial Bitcoin holdings in recent years, reinforcing the asset’s role beyond retail speculation.
Her $1.5 million forecast by 2030 assumes continued integration of Bitcoin into mainstream financial infrastructure and broader acceptance as a reserve-like asset. While some analysts view the projection as aggressive, supporters argue that asymmetric upside could justify small portfolio allocations.
Critics, however, question whether adoption rates and macroeconomic conditions will align with ARK’s assumptions. Bitcoin’s price history has been marked by significant volatility, and regulatory developments remain a key variable.
Wood’s recommendation highlights a shifting conversation about the role of digital assets in long-term portfolio construction. By positioning Bitcoin as a competitor to gold, she challenges traditional safe-haven allocations and underscores the cryptocurrency’s growing institutional legitimacy.
Read also: Bitcoin consolidates near $68,000 amid rising whale activity