World Liberty Financial token faces security scrutiny amid Trump-linked crypto ties

Traders Union
All News
Crypto
WLFI token security questions

Highlights

Lee Reiners argues World Liberty Financial's WLFI token, launched in October 2024, may constitute an unregistered security based on SEC token taxonomy and project marketing.
Governance disputes include a $75 million stablecoin loan using 5 billion WLFI as collateral and a lawsuit by Justin Sun alleging blocked governance rights, suggesting centralization.
DT Marks DEFI LLC, Trump-linked, owns 38% of World Liberty and is entitled to 75% of WLFI sale proceeds after a $500 million 2026 deal, intensifying regulatory and ethical scrutiny.

Legal case centers on token design

As reported by The Block, Lee Reiners, a lecturing fellow at Duke University and former Federal Reserve Bank of New York examiner, argues in a recent blog post that World Liberty Financial may have issued an unregistered security through its WLFI token.

Reiners says WLFI does not qualify as a pure digital commodity despite the project’s description of it as a governance token. He points to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s recent token taxonomy and argues that the sale structure, marketing and development promises around the token support potential SEC scrutiny.

World Liberty launched in October 2024 and presented WLFI in its “Gold Paper” as a voting token for its lending protocol, saying it carried no claim on equity, dividends or profit rights. Reiners argues that approximately 25 billion tokens were sold from a total supply of 100 billion before the protocol was built, and that buyers likely committed capital with a reasonable expectation of profit, a core element of the Howey Test.

He also argues that the project’s use of the Trump family brand matters under the SEC’s own interpretation of how issuer marketing and official communications can shape investor expectations. In his view, promises to build functionality, expand network effects and support the project could all strengthen the case that WLFI is treated as a security.

Governance disputes add political risk

Reiners further challenges the claim that World Liberty and WLFI operate in a decentralized way. He cites what he describes as apparent self-dealing, including an arrangement involving the Dolomite lending protocol to borrow $75 million in stablecoins using 5 billion WLFI as collateral.

He also points to a lawsuit by Justin Sun, who alleges World Liberty froze his tokens and blocked his governance rights despite his early backing of the project. Reiners says those allegations, if true, suggest World Liberty retains sweeping unilateral control over WLFI, which would further weaken the argument that the token is merely a decentralized governance tool.

Late last month, World Liberty opened a governance process that would unlock billions of presale tokens in about four years, a move that drew criticism from some presale investors who say they have little influence over decisions. Members of Congress have repeatedly raised ethics concerns over the Trump family’s crypto involvement, including World Liberty’s operations.

A Trump-affiliated entity, DT Marks DEFI LLC, is thought to own about 38% of World Liberty after a $500 million deal in early 2026 involving a UAE-linked buyer tied to Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, which purchased 49% of the protocol. World Liberty’s website says DT Marks DEFI LLC is entitled to 75% of net proceeds from WLFI token sales, while Abu Dhabi state investor MGX also used World Liberty’s USD1 stablecoin in a $2 billion investment in Binance, adding to the broader scrutiny around the venture.

Our earlier report on the U.S. Justice Department’s National Fraud Enforcement Division outlined a broadened nationwide crackdown on major fraud schemes spanning health care, public benefits, tax, and financial crimes, with alleged losses and claims nearing $1 billion. The update highlighted a series of indictments, guilty pleas, and lengthy prison sentences, underscoring a wider push for tougher federal oversight and prosecutions.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.