Philippines 2027 budget sharpens focus on unprogrammed appropriations
The Philippines' proposed P7.2-trillion budget for 2027 moves to Congress as scrutiny intensifies over fiscal discipline and corruption risks in public spending. A much smaller allocation for unprogrammed appropriations has become a central issue after a Supreme Court ruling and criticism of how such funds were used in recent years.
Highlights
- The proposed 2027 Philippine budget is P7.2 trillion, up 6% from 2026, with a projected P1.69 trillion deficit and P3.3 trillion in gross borrowings.
- Unprogrammed appropriations drop to P111.984 billion, 1.5% of total spending—the lowest ratio since 1991—following a Supreme Court ruling on constitutional limits.
- Debt interest exceeds P1.1 trillion while education, infrastructure, and public works allocations rise, intensifying scrutiny over fiscal discipline and governance risks.
Budget proposal and unprogrammed funds
As reported by BusinessWorld, citing the Department of Budget and Management, the proposed 2027 National Expenditure Program totals P7.2 trillion, equal to about 21.7% of GDP and 6% higher than the 2026 budget. The government projects P5.21 trillion in revenues, P6.9 trillion in direct spending and a deficit of P1.69 trillion, or 5.1% of GDP, while planning P3.3 trillion in gross borrowings to help finance the program.Major allocations include about P975 billion to P976 billion for education, P644 billion for public works, P328 billion for defense and more than P1.1 trillion for debt interest. Infrastructure spending is set at P1.47 trillion, up 13%, with the Department of Public Works and Highways receiving a 21% increase and the Department of Transportation getting P301 billion, including P197 billion for foreign-assisted projects such as the LRT Cavite Extension, North-South Commuter Railway and Metro Manila Subway.
Included in the proposal are P111.984 billion in unprogrammed appropriations, which the DBM says is the lowest nominal amount since 2019 and just 1.5% of the total expenditure program, the lowest ratio since 1991. The items cover P57 billion for restoring the fund balances of the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp., P3.6 billion for a risk management program, P42.6 billion for support to foreign-assisted projects and P8.8 billion for converting National Government advances into subsidy for GOCCs.
Legal and policy pressure on the spending plan
The smaller unprogrammed allocation comes after steep increases in earlier years, when such appropriations reached P807.16 billion in 2023, P731.4 billion in 2024 and P531.7 billion in 2025, before falling to about P150 billion in 2026. Civil society groups, lawmakers and citizens challenged those provisions before the Supreme Court, arguing that standby appropriations and budget adjustments lacked constitutional limits.On Oct. 7, the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional Congress's increase in unprogrammed appropriations in the 2024 General Appropriations Act by P449.5 billion, along with specific provisions in the 2026 GAA and an increase in the 2025 Special Road Fund. The court said unprogrammed funds become constitutionally infirm when they lack sufficient standards and weaken fiscal discipline, and it stressed that they may be released only when revenues exceed the targets stated in the Budget of Expenditures and Sources of Funding.
The ruling is now feeding into the 2027 budget debate in Congress. The House of Representatives says House Bill No. 10858, the proposed 2027 General Appropriations Bill, passes third and final reading on Oct. 12 with a 281-13 vote and one abstention, while critics including the Makabayan bloc and Kabataan Party-list call for the measure to be recalled over allegedly unconstitutional provisions.
Business and policy groups are also pressing for tighter oversight. The Management Association of the Philippines says the 2027 budget process is a test of the government's response to corruption concerns, while former Finance Secretary Margarito Teves warns that debt service is taking a larger share of the budget and that weak disbursement capacity in infrastructure agencies raises execution and governance risks.
In our earlier article on sovereign borrowing risks in a higher-rate environment, we explained how sustained fiscal expansion alongside geopolitical tensions can erode fiscal headroom and make refinancing more costly. We also noted that emerging and frontier markets are especially exposed because debt-service burdens tend to be high relative to narrower revenue bases, leaving public finances more vulnerable to persistent inflation and funding shocks.