UK housing programme keeps £10bn allocation model, limiting council homes shift

UK housing programme keeps £10bn allocation model, limiting council homes shift
UK housing fund stays course

The UK government is keeping the initial allocation of its £39bn social and affordable homes programme largely in line with plans drawn up before Andy Burnham took office. The decision directs most of the first £10bn to housing associations, even as Burnham has argued the fund should focus on council housing.

Highlights

  • The UK government maintains a £10bn allocation model benefiting 33 organisations, primarily housing associations, in Labour’s first phase of social and affordable homes programme.
  • About 60 percent of the initial 70,000 homes will be for social rent, while councils' direct role remains limited despite technical changes easing their future access.
  • With only £16bn left after London funding and councils having built 10,500 homes last year, a major expansion of council-led building faces funding obstacles.

Initial funding plan and council access

As reported by Financial Times, the government sets out plans to allocate £10bn to 33 organisations, mainly housing associations but also some councils, under the first phase of Labour’s social and affordable homes programme. About 60 per cent of the 70,000 homes in this tranche are earmarked for social rent, broadly matching the allocation model prepared under Sir Keir Starmer.

Burnham has previously said local authorities should play a bigger role in subsidised housing, arguing that public control matters. But people familiar with ministers’ thinking say bids for this round were finalised before he took over, and that restarting the process would have caused delays while 180,000 children are living in temporary accommodation.

Officials say technical changes now make it easier for councils to bid for support from the programme, and that future stages are expected to tilt more towards local authorities. Even so, after separate funding for London is taken into account, the government has only £16bn left to commit, which makes a major expansion of council-led building difficult without extra funding.

Political pressure and sector implications

The decision raises questions over how Burnham will meet promises of delivering the biggest council housebuilding programme since the postwar period. Councils built 10,500 homes last year, with half of local authorities building none, far below the annual averages of about 190,000 in the 1950s and 130,000 in the 1970s.

Housing associations remain central to the current delivery model in England, where subsidised homes include social rent, affordable rent and shared ownership. Kate Henderson, chief executive of the National Housing Federation, calls the decision a major vote of confidence in not-for-profit housing associations and in the distinct role they play.

The housing debate is also sharpening politically. Reform UK says it wants to prioritise British-born working families for social housing, with married couples with children ranked above unmarried couples with children, while deputy leader Richard Tice says a building programme could be financed without tax rises by changing property valuations for housing associations and allowing them to borrow more.

Our earlier article looked at the mounting pressure around the government’s upcoming Budget as long-term UK borrowing costs rise and markets scrutinise adherence to fiscal rules. We noted that tighter fiscal headroom and competing demands on public spending could force tough trade-offs, making measures like improving public-sector productivity a key lever to limit borrowing pressures without sharper tax rises or cuts.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.