European leaders are negotiating the bloc’s next seven-year budget from 2028, with proposed cuts and a possible reordering of aid spending raising concern across the development sector. The United Nations says moving more funding toward EU agencies instead of specialist multilateral bodies risks worsening crises and reducing Brussels’ global leverage.
Highlights
- Ireland has proposed a 17% (€33 billion) cut to EU development funding from 2028, intensifying disputes over aid priorities during budget negotiations.
- UN Secretary-General António Guterres warns that reduced and Europe-focused development spending could erode Europe's global influence, credibility, and long-term stability.
- European Commission plans to give EU bodies preference in development aid allocation risk sidelining UN agencies and prioritizing EU interests over partner-country needs.
Budget talks sharpen dispute over aid priorities
As first reported by Financial Times, UN Secretary-General António Guterres warns in letters to European Council President António Costa, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and other leaders that lower development spending and a stronger European preference in aid allocation could carry heavy long-term costs.In the letter seen by the newspaper, Guterres says “insufficient funding today will mean costlier crises, deepening inequalities, greater instability and weaker influence tomorrow”. He adds that investing in development strengthens Europe’s credibility and influence as a reliable partner when other powers are stepping back or trying to reshape the international order.
European countries are negotiating the next seven-year EU budget from 2028, and Ireland, which is leading the talks, has pushed to cut Brussels’ proposed development funding by 17%, or 33 billion euros, alongside broader reductions. Guterres argues the budget should ensure resources go where needs are greatest and create lasting impact, including through the complementary roles of the UN, civil society groups and EU and member-state agencies.
Funding shift raises concerns across development sector
Concern is also growing over plans that would give EU bodies an advantage in future funding competitions. Koen Doens, head of the Commission’s international partnerships directorate, last week told UN agencies that EU bodies were set to get preference, according to two people briefed on the discussions.One person briefed on the talks says the EU wants to implement its policies with European partners if possible and only then look to others, a shift they say would in practice squeeze out UN agencies even if that is not the stated goal. Another says the approach marks a change from a system centred on partner-country needs to one that also weighs what serves the EU’s interests.
The debate comes as UN agencies are already facing severe funding pressure after U.S. cuts to overseas aid under President Donald Trump. Aid officials and development experts fear European agencies could receive projects regardless of whether they have the deepest expertise on displacement, climate change or poverty reduction, while EU lawmakers and member states still have to negotiate both the wider budget and any change in aid rules.
A spokesperson for Costa, who is planning a possible meeting with Guterres next month, confirms he has received the UN chief’s letter. Barry Andrews, the MEP who chairs the European Parliament’s development committee, says the Commission has moved ahead of settled political decisions, adding that several steps remain before any final outcome is agreed.
In our earlier article on Mario Draghi’s policy warning, we explained how aggressive debt control and inflation fighting can end up suppressing the structural investment needed for Europe’s long-term growth and resilience. Draghi argued that central banks should keep rates no higher than necessary to restore price stability, while Europe complements monetary policy with measures such as deeper EU market integration, industrial policy, and targeted EU-budget funding to support strategic investment.