GFS Review 2026

Logo GFS
Top Brokers Overview — United States

GFS Pros & Cons

  • Free demo accounts and micro lot trading are available;
  • No minimum deposit requirements apply to an account type;
  • Raw spreads ensure low trading expenses;
  • Flexible leverage ranges from 1:1 to 1:500;
  • Deposits and withdrawals are made using popular methods without brokerage fees;
  • MetaTrader 5 is easy-to-use, customizable, and offers many in-built features;
  • Technical support is available via phone, email, and live chat.
  • No joint accounts, crypto staking, or other passive income options;
  • Relatively high trading fees;
  • The broker doesn’t provide its services to residents of Belgium, North Korea, and some other countries.

TU Expert Verdict

Chief Analytics Officer

GFS demonstrates moderate stability and can suit certain traders. Its conditions are acceptable, and feedback is mixed but reasonable. In my own tests, it performed adequately, though it lacks the consistency of higher-rated companies.

Top-5 Brokers Traders Prefer

Regulation Tier-1
EUR/USD 0.9 pips
Regulation Not regulated
EUR/USD 0.1 pips
Regulation Tier-1
EUR/USD 0.5 pips
title="OANDA" OANDA
Logo OANDA
OANDA
6.9 /10
Regulation Tier-1
EUR/USD 0.1 pips
Regulation Tier-1
EUR/USD 0.7 pips

GFS User Reviews

Score:
The administration of the website shall not be liable for the accuracy of the reviews and does not have the technical ability to check the reviews for accuracy, as well as establish whether the authors of the reviews are indeed the customers of a specific company. To learn more about how the User Satisfaction score is calculated and how we apply the Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT) methodology, please read the assessment criteria.
6.7 /10
3 total
  • 5-star
    0%
  • 4-star
    33%
  • 3-star
    67%
  • 2-star
    0%
  • 1-star
    0%
erwin_24
1 year ago

I’ve been working with GFS for 4 months. A demo account confirmed the transparency of the broker’s conditions. There is only one live account type, which I consider an advantage. Spreads are tight, but trading fees are above average. GFS doesn’t charge withdrawal fees and leverage up to 1:500 is sufficient for my trading style. While many traders prefer MT4 or solutions like RTrader or cTrader, I find MT5 to be a great platform. The main disadvantage for me is the absence of joint accounts.

hasdianna
1 year ago

I registered with GFS following a referral link from a trader I know. After trying out a demo account for a couple of days, I found the broker’s conditions to be more profitable than those of many popular brokers. First of all, it offers raw spreads and a wide choice of assets. Leverage is up to 1:500, which is too much for me since I use a maximum of 1:50. While I hadn't used MT5 before, I quickly mastered it due to its intuitive and user-friendly interface. I wish there were more passive income options, as a typical partnership program is not interesting to me. The broker has been on the market for a long time and is licensed, which I checked myself. However, GFS lacks regulation.

handaytr
2 years ago

I registered with GFS a year ago and I’m 100% satisfied with its conditions. There are many CFDs and currency pairs, leverage is flexible, and MT5 is just perfect. The broker's partnership program stands out by offering higher rewards than most standard programs. Since I manage my blog, I actively attract new traders. Though I contacted technical support once or twice only, I can say that it is prompt and helpful. I see no point in further describing the broker, as it doesn’t have any significant disadvantages. Open a demo account and try it yourself. I recommend GFS.

  • Commissions and Fees

    Score:
    We evaluate brokers' fees and spreads by assessing the costs associated with Standard and ECN/Raw spread accounts, including commissions and spreads. Additionally, our evaluation considers extra fees such as deposit/withdrawal charges and inactivity fees. Learn the assessment criteria
    4 /10

    The trading and non-trading commissions of GFS have been analyzed and rated as having High fees, with a fees score of 4/10. Additionally, these commissions were compared with those of the top two competitors, ZForex and OANDA, to provide the most comprehensive information.

    • No deposit fee
    • No withdrawal fee
    • Above-average Forex trading fees
    • No ECN/Raw Spread account
  • Is GFS Safe?

    Score:
    We evaluate brokers' safety based on several key criteria. The highest value is placed on regulation, especially Tier 1 regulation, which ensures adherence to stringent standards set by top financial authorities like the FCA in the UK, CFTC in the US, CySEc and BaFin (EU) or ASIC (Australia). High scores are also given for participation in investor protection funds, which safeguard clients' funds in case of broker insolvency. Learn the assessment criteria
    8 /10

    GFS has a safety score of 8/10, which corresponds to a High security level. The safest brokers are those with Tier-1 regulation, a long history (over 10 years in the market), and participation in investor compensation schemes.

    • Tier-1 regulated
    • Negative balance protection
    • Track record of less than 8 years
  • Account Types

    Score:
    We evaluate a broker’s account offering by analyzing the range and suitability of available account types and how effectively they cater to different trader profiles and strategies. Our assessment covers the diversity of account options — including Standard, ECN/Raw, Cent, Swap-Free (Islamic), and VIP accounts — as well as the flexibility of trading conditions provided. Learn the assessment criteria.
    3.3 /10

    GFS offers the following account options: Demo, Standard.

    However, GFS does not provide a Standard account, which can be a drawback for traders who prefer classic spread-based pricing models.

    • Standard account with balanced trading conditions
    • Low minimum deposit
    • Demo account
    • No ECN/Raw spread account
    • No Cent account
  • Deposit and Withdrawal

    Score:
    This section assesses the efficiency, speed, and affordability of brokers’ transaction processes, focusing on available methods, currencies, and fees. For further details, please refer to our data-focused methodology
    4.5 /10

    GFS received a Low score for the efficiency and convenience of its deposit and withdrawal processes.

  • Markets and Tradable Assets

    Score:
    The evaluation in this section is based on the TU methodology and reflects the total number and variety of tradable assets offered by the broker, including Forex currency pairs. It also considers the availability of passive income tools such as PAMM accounts, copy trading, and similar services. All information is obtained from publicly available sources and may change. Learn the assessment criteria
    6.5 /10

    GFS provides a standard range of trading assets in line with the market average. The platform includes 1635 assets in total and 61 Forex currency pairs.

  • Trading Account Opening

    Score:
    We evaluated Trading Account Opening at GFS by testing the registration process under real conditions, including opening an account and funding it with the minimum required deposit (but no less than $100). Our assessment considered whether onboarding was fully online, the average registration time, the speed of KYC verification, and how quickly traders could activate their accounts. Learn the assessment criteria.
    8 /10
    We successfully registered an account with GFS in 20 minutes. The KYC verification was completed within 2 business days. The minimum deposit amount at GFS is $0.

    This is one of the most accessible and hassle-free onboarding procedures on the market.

  • Customer Support

    Score:
    We evaluated Customer Support at GFS by opening a real account funded with the minimum required deposit (no less than $100) and contacting support to measure response time under real conditions. Our assessment considered contact channels, response speed, multilingual support, and availability hours. Learn the assessment criteria
    3.6 /10

Best GFS Alternatives

Regulation Tier-1
EUR/USD 0.9 pips
Regulation Not regulated
EUR/USD 0.1 pips
Regulation Tier-1
EUR/USD 0.5 pips
title="OANDA" OANDA
Logo OANDA
OANDA
6.9 /10
Regulation Tier-1
EUR/USD 0.1 pips
Regulation Tier-1
EUR/USD 0.7 pips

FAQs

How secure is trading with GFS in terms of regulation and safety measures?

GFS has a safety score of 8/10, which corresponds to a high security level in the reviewed methodology. It is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), a Tier-1 regulator, and provides negative balance protection and KYC verification, although its track record is less than 8 years and the foundation date is not specified.

What account types and trading conditions does GFS offer to its clients?

According to the review, GFS provides a demo account and a real account with no minimum deposit requirement, spreads starting from 0 pips, and a trading fee of $10 per lot. Leverage is available up to 1:500, micro-lot trading is mentioned as possible, and trading is conducted on the MT5 platform, while details such as swap-free or VIP options are not specified in this section.

What do GFS user reviews indicate about overall client satisfaction?

GFS has a user satisfaction score of 6.7/10 based on 3 reviews, with 33% of ratings at 4 stars and 67% at 3 stars, and no 5-, 2-, or 1-star ratings. Based on available user reviews, overall impressions are mixed rather than strongly positive or negative.

How are deposits and withdrawals structured at GFS and what limitations are mentioned in reviews?

The review states that GFS supports deposits and withdrawals via bank cards and bank wire, with no deposit or withdrawal fees, a $0 minimum deposit, and a $10 minimum withdrawal. However, it also notes limited payment options, only major base currencies (USD is specified), and the absence of PayPal, which may reduce flexibility for some users.

What does the review say about GFS customer support responsiveness and availability?

Customer support at GFS is described as available 24/5 via call center, email, tickets, and live chat, and is appreciated by clients, but testing found response speed below expectations and assistance limited in depth. The review also notes that requests submitted on weekends are processed on the next business day, which may be inconvenient for users needing immediate help.

Articles that may help you

Editorial Team

Top 5 companies for you
United States
United States
  • Afghanistan Afghanistan
  • Albania Albania
  • Algeria Algeria
  • Angola Angola
  • Argentina Argentina
  • Armenia Armenia
  • Australia Australia
  • Austria Austria
  • Azerbaijan Azerbaijan
  • Bahamas Bahamas
  • Bahrain Bahrain
  • Bangladesh Bangladesh
  • Belarus Belarus
  • Belgium Belgium
  • Bolivia Bolivia
  • Botswana Botswana
  • Brazil Brazil
  • Brunei Brunei
  • Bulgaria Bulgaria
  • Cambodia Cambodia
  • Cameroon Cameroon
  • Canada Canada
  • Chile Chile
  • China China
  • Colombia Colombia
  • Congo Congo
  • Costa Rica Costa Rica
  • Cote d'Ivoire Cote d'Ivoire
  • Croatia Croatia
  • Cuba Cuba
  • Cyprus Cyprus
  • Czechia Czechia
  • DR Congo DR Congo
  • Denmark Denmark
  • Dominican Republic Dominican Republic
  • Ecuador Ecuador
  • Egypt Egypt
  • El Salvador El Salvador
  • Estonia Estonia
  • Eswatini Eswatini
  • Ethiopia Ethiopia
  • Finland Finland
  • France France
  • Georgia Georgia
  • Germany Germany
  • Ghana Ghana
  • Greece Greece
  • Haiti Haiti
  • Hong Kong Hong Kong
  • Hungary Hungary
  • India India
  • Indonesia Indonesia
  • Iran, Islamic republic Iran, Islamic republic
  • Iraq Iraq
  • Ireland Ireland
  • Israel Israel
  • Italy Italy
  • Jamaica Jamaica
  • Japan Japan
  • Jordan Jordan
  • Kazakhstan Kazakhstan
  • Kenya Kenya
  • Korea Korea
  • Kuwait Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan Kyrgyzstan
  • Laos Laos
  • Latvia Latvia
  • Lebanon Lebanon
  • Lesotho Lesotho
  • Libya Libya
  • Lithuania Lithuania
  • Luxembourg Luxembourg
  • Madagascar Madagascar
  • Malaysia Malaysia
  • Malta Malta
  • Mauritius Mauritius
  • Mexico Mexico
  • Moldova Moldova
  • Mongolia Mongolia
  • Montenegro Montenegro
  • Morocco Morocco
  • Mozambique Mozambique
  • Myanmar Myanmar
  • Namibia Namibia
  • Nepal Nepal
  • Netherlands Netherlands
  • New Zealand New Zealand
  • Nigeria Nigeria
  • North Macedonia North Macedonia
  • Norway Norway
  • Oman Oman
  • Pakistan Pakistan
  • Palestine Palestine
  • Panama Panama
  • Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay Paraguay
  • Peru Peru
  • Philippines Philippines
  • Poland Poland
  • Portugal Portugal
  • Puerto Rico Puerto Rico
  • Qatar Qatar
  • Reunion Reunion
  • Romania Romania
  • Rwanda Rwanda
  • Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia
  • Serbia Serbia
  • Singapore Singapore
  • Slovakia Slovakia
  • Slovenia Slovenia
  • Somalia Somalia
  • South Africa South Africa
  • Spain Spain
  • Sri Lanka Sri Lanka
  • Sweden Sweden
  • Switzerland Switzerland
  • Syria Syria
  • Taiwan Taiwan
  • Tajikistan Tajikistan
  • Tanzania Tanzania
  • Thailand Thailand
  • Trinidad and Tobago Trinidad and Tobago
  • Tunisia Tunisia
  • Turkey Turkey
  • UAE UAE
  • Uganda Uganda
  • Ukraine Ukraine
  • United Kingdom United Kingdom
  • United States United States
  • Uruguay Uruguay
  • Uzbekistan Uzbekistan
  • Venezuela Venezuela
  • Vietnam Vietnam
  • Yemen Yemen
  • Zambia Zambia
  • Zimbabwe Zimbabwe
  • Forex
  • Crypto
Table of Contents