UK non-compete curbs face backlash from finance as start-ups push hiring reform

Traders Union
All News
Business & Wealth
Companies
UK non-compete clause debate

Highlights

Prime Minister Andy Burnham plans legislation restricting non-compete clauses, targeting over 5 million UK workers across finance, technology, and professional services.
In London's hedge fund sector, typical non-compete clauses bench portfolio managers for 18–24 months and analysts for up to a year, stalling industry mobility.
AI and tech founders warn lengthy UK post-employment restrictions hinder scaling efforts, prompting some to consider U.S. hires where such barriers are less prevalent.

Proposed UK reform sharpens industry split

As reported by Financial Times, Prime Minister Andy Burnham this month is pledging legislation to ensure non-compete clauses can no longer be a barrier to hiring for promising start-ups and scaling companies, bringing a long-running employment practice under fresh scrutiny in the UK.

More than 5mn British workers have non-compete clauses in their contracts, covering sectors from finance and professional services to technology. The restrictions are designed to protect intellectual property, client relationships and employer investment in training, but critics say their use has spread well beyond senior roles and now reaches lower-paid workers while also lasting longer in some cases.

In London's hedge fund market, portfolio managers at top firms often face non-competes that keep them out of the market for 18 months to two years, while analysts may have to wait a year. Supporters of the clauses argue they stop staff from walking directly to rivals with sensitive strategies and client knowledge, but opponents say unpaid waiting periods in the UK can erode skills and reduce workers' attractiveness to future employers.

Technology founders are pressing for tighter limits, arguing that long notice periods and post-employment restrictions slow expansion. Alan Chang of Fuse says his company's hiring was delayed by restrictions on its chief technology officer, while PhysicsX founder Jacomo Corbo says he is negotiating a 15-month non-compete to recruit one employee and is considering more U.S. hiring because such barriers are less common there.

Edward Hughes, who co-founded London AI start-up Inherent after leaving Google DeepMind, says these restrictions risk leaving fast-growing UK companies behind Californian competitors. Burnham has not set out full details of the reform, but says the aim is to free up hiring for innovative sectors including AI.

In our earlier article on ByteDance’s AI safety hiring drive, we covered how its Seed research unit set up an Alignment & Preparedness team and began recruiting researchers across China and the U.S. to strengthen testing, oversight, and readiness for emerging risks. We also noted that tighter scrutiny of increasingly autonomous AI systems is turning safety and alignment into a core capability tied to commercialization and large-scale deployment.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.