U.S. banking groups urge Senate to tighten stablecoin yield rules in Clarity Act

Traders Union
All News
Crypto
Senate urged on stablecoin yield

Highlights

American Bankers Association, Independent Community Bankers of America, and 76 state groups urged the Senate to clarify Section 404 in the Clarity Act to tighten restrictions on stablecoin yields.
The banking groups argue that vague prohibitions on yield-like incentives could encourage stablecoin holding over transaction use, threatening community bank lending and credit flows.
The Clarity Act remains contentious, with banking sector opposition, differing House and Senate language, and outstanding issues including law enforcement powers and ethics rules for federal officials.

Section 404 concerns and Senate push

According to The Block, the American Bankers Association, the Independent Community Bankers of America and 76 state banking associations said in a joint letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Minority Leader Charles Schumer that the bill needs clearer guardrails around payment stablecoins.

In the letter sent on Monday, the groups argue that ambiguities in Section 404 could allow stablecoin arrangements to act as substitutes for deposits. While the section bars crypto firms from paying direct or indirect interest or yield on payment stablecoins, it still permits activity-based or transaction-based rewards.

The associations say significant questions remain over whether the current wording provides enough clarity and certainty to meet that objective. They contend that the provisions may not do enough to discourage incentives that prompt customers to hold stablecoins for longer periods instead of using them only for transactions.

Implications for community banks and the bill's path

The banking groups say community bank deposits support mortgage lending, small-business financing, agricultural credit and other relationship-based banking services that underpin local economies. In their view, enforceable limits on interest-like and yield-like incentives are necessary to protect the flow of credit on which local communities depend.

The latest letter reinforces the banking sector's broader opposition to parts of the Clarity Act amid a continuing dispute with crypto industry groups over stablecoin rewards and yield. In a related development, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association backs the House version of the bill while calling for refinements to preserve federal law enforcement powers in areas including anti-money laundering, sanctions enforcement and investigations involving decentralized systems.

Another unresolved issue is whether the legislation should include ethics restrictions on how presidents, vice presidents, members of Congress and other federal officials can profit from digital assets while in office. The measure is on the Senate calendar awaiting a floor vote, and if the Senate passes it, the House still needs to approve it before it goes to the President.

Our earlier article covered Senator Elizabeth Warren’s call for tighter ethics safeguards ahead of the Senate’s debate on crypto market structure legislation. She urged Senate leaders to add provisions that would bar senior U.S. officials and their families from profiting from the digital-asset sector, citing disclosures that intensified scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.