Clarity Act debate highlights compliance and sanctions enforcement in U.S. crypto policy

Traders Union
All News
Crypto
Clarity Act & crypto policy

Highlights

The Clarity Act would fully subject digital asset service providers to the Bank Secrecy Act, mandating risk controls, compliance officers, audits, and real-time law enforcement data sharing.
The bill grants the Treasury Department explicit authority to target foreign jurisdictions for money laundering, empowers service providers to freeze suspect digital funds, and protects non-custodial developers under the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act.
Law enforcement groups support the bill for its expanded BSA coverage and sanctions enforcement, while proponents argue its measures will keep U.S. crypto firms onshore and enhance investigation tools for combating illicit finance.

Bill provisions and enforcement tools

As argued in an opinion piece published by CoinDesk, Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, says the bill in its current form would bring digital asset service providers fully under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring risk assessments, internal controls, compliance officers, training, audits, and suspicious activity reporting.

Redbord writes that the legislation also formalizes real-time information sharing between exchanges and law enforcement, based on the Beacon Network model, and calls for an independent working group to develop AI-powered tools to detect terrorist financing and money laundering in digital asset markets. He adds that kiosk operators would face wallet pinning, hold periods, daily transaction caps for first-time users, and blockchain intelligence requirements intended to stop scams before funds leave a platform.

The opinion piece says the Treasury Department would gain explicit authority to act against jurisdictions of primary money laundering concern at the source, while a digital assets hold law would give service providers and stablecoin issuers clearer authority to hold or freeze funds linked to suspected illicit activity. It also says non-custodial developers who do not handle user funds would receive legal protection under the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, while preserving prosecutors' ability to pursue money laundering conspiracy cases against those who knowingly facilitate criminal proceeds.

Implications for U.S. crypto oversight

Redbord frames the measure as a way to keep crypto builders and companies inside the U.S. regulatory perimeter rather than pushing them offshore, arguing that firms operating domestically remain subject to the Bank Secrecy Act, U.S. courts, and U.S. law enforcement reach.

He points to reporting on Hong Kong exchange CoinEx as evidence that public blockchains can aid investigations rather than obscure them, citing traced transactions tied to Iran, sanctioned military networks, and funds stolen by North Korean hackers. In his view, that transparency shows blockchain tools can help disrupt sanctions evasion at scale rather than enable it.

The article also says several law enforcement groups, including the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, the Major County Sheriffs of America, and the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, support the bill because of its Bank Secrecy Act coverage, sanctions authority, and transaction hold provisions. The piece presents the broader policy argument that emerging technologies such as crypto, blockchain, and AI should be regulated and used for enforcement purposes, not broadly restricted because of criminal misuse.

In our earlier coverage of Congress’s hearing on the Federal Reserve’s policy framework, lawmakers pressed for reforms aimed at reinforcing the Fed’s independence and refocusing its mandate on price stability amid inflation above the 2% target. The discussion also highlighted criticism of prolonged quantitative easing and concerns about regulatory “mission creep,” including the Fed’s expanding attention to areas such as digital assets.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.