U.S. crypto bill advances toward final Senate test amid Trump ethics debate

Traders Union
All News
Crypto
U.S. crypto bill Senate test

Highlights

Supporters aim to advance the U.S. crypto regulation bill before the Senate's August 7 recess, though legislative delays could push approval further out.
The bill's key unresolved issue is ethics language addressing Trump's potential conflicts of interest, specifically restricting financial benefits from digital assets for federal officials.
Initial industry disputes over stablecoin rewards and software developer protections are easing, leaving the ethics clause as the primary remaining barrier to passage.

Senate timing and unresolved ethics provisions

The Block reports that supporters of the legislation are aiming to move the measure before the Senate's August recess, with updated legislative text expected this week.

Rep. William Timmons, a Republican from South Carolina, says the bill remains one of the president's priorities and retains bipartisan backing in Congress. He says lawmakers are going to get it done, though he acknowledges the timeline could slip into the next few months as the Senate and House work through the final steps.

The measure would establish the first comprehensive federal framework for regulating the crypto industry. The House passed its version of the Clarity Act a year ago, but the bill has remained stalled in the Senate over the past year.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune says he wants the bill on the Senate floor before lawmakers leave for the August break. If the Senate approves its own version, the legislation would still need to return to the House, a step that may not happen before the House begins recess on July 24, while the Senate remains in session until Aug. 7.

Industry implications and political pressure

The main unresolved issue now is how negotiators address concerns over Trump's potential conflicts of interest in crypto. Lawmakers from both parties have spent months working on ethics language intended to limit the ability of presidents, vice presidents, members of Congress and other federal officials to financially benefit from digital assets while in office.

Other disputes appear to be easing, including tensions between banks and crypto firms over stablecoin rewards and debate around protections for software developers. That leaves the ethics question as the most significant remaining challenge for a bill that could reshape oversight of the digital asset sector in the U.S.

Rep. Steven Horsford, a Democrat from Nevada, says he supports the legislation because of its potential benefits for constituents, users and small businesses. His comments reflect a broader push among backers to keep the focus on market participants and commercial use of digital assets rather than on the Trump administration and the president's family.

Our earlier report on the CFTC probe into alleged Kalshi trading tied to President Donald Trump’s statements highlighted how prediction markets can face heightened compliance and market-integrity risks when trades may be linked to nonpublic political information. We noted that such cases can intensify regulatory scrutiny of event-based contracts and surveillance controls, potentially tightening oversight for platforms operating at the intersection of finance and politics.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.