Why Zuckerberg is losing the social media battle to Durov and Musk

Traders Union
All News
Editors' Picks
Top social networks for crypto communities

Why the biggest social networks have become the worst place for crypto communities

If we look at fresh analytics from Salesforce, the leaders by monthly active users appear almost untouchable. Facebook firmly holds first place with 3.1 billion users, while Instagram and TikTok control the attention of another 5 billion people.

Loading...

The tweet was deleted by the author.

But we saved everything 🙂.

For traditional retail or mass-market brands, this is an ideal environment. But for crypto projects, this giant infrastructure has turned out to be almost completely sterile.

The reason is simple: digital giants operate within a logic of regulatory fear. For them, cryptocurrencies are not innovations but a bundle of reputational risks. That is why Meta and ByteDance algorithms filter financial content so aggressively. Organic reach on these platforms depends not on the quality of the material or genuine user interest, but on the paranoia of moderators who see a potential scam everywhere.

For the mass market, this kind of protection may be useful. But for crypto communities, it has become a basic restriction of oxygen. As a result, despite having billions of users on paper, traditional social networks are voluntarily isolating themselves and handing a colossal market to competitors. The global audience of direct cryptocurrency owners has already exceeded 740 million people. Traditional platforms are simply losing to those that gave users what matters most: speed and freedom of action.

X: The main exchange of crypto attention

Although X has only 650 million monthly active users, almost five times fewer than Facebook, it is the main platform for the cryptocurrency market.

This is where narratives are born that can turn into market momentum within hours and move prices: from ETF launches and meme coin rallies to venture fund insights and statements from politicians at the level of Donald Trump. The market does not come to X after a trend has already formed. The trend is created directly inside the news feed.

Of course, X is far from perfect. The platform is overloaded with bots, paid noise, manipulation, and fake accounts. But this chaos partly mirrors the invasive nature of the crypto market itself.

X matters not because of technological perfection, but because of the unique concentration of people who create market meaning: traders, developers, analysts, crypto exchange heads, and influencers. There are no long approval chains here. Any piece of information can instantly become liquidity.

Telegram: The operating system of crypto communities

Telegram is less public than X, but it is much closer to the real daily life of crypto projects. Channels, private chats, bots, support, local communities, OTC deals, listing announcements, testnets, farming — all of this has long turned Telegram from a simple messenger into the working infrastructure of the crypto market.

The platform’s main advantage is the minimal friction between receiving information and making a transaction. Today, Telegram has effectively merged with Web3 through the TON ecosystem. Built-in tools, from a simple custodial wallet to the decentralized TON Space, allow users to transfer cryptocurrency directly inside chats. It works as easily as sending a photo or a sticker.

This case shows a fundamentally new model: cryptocurrency no longer forces users to go to complex external DEX platforms or exchanges. It is being embedded into a familiar everyday environment, completely changing the mechanics of entering the industry for the mass user.

Reddit and YouTube: Not hype, but trust

Although both Reddit and YouTube operate more slowly, their role is no less important.

Reddit is the main X-ray machine for any Web3 startup. In thematic subreddits, it is almost impossible to sell an empty promise: the community immediately dissects a project in detail, asking tough questions about tokenomics, the team’s real background, and security audits.

YouTube, in turn, provides depth of context. Users do not go there for instant signals, but for detailed technical breakdowns, interviews with founders, and macroeconomic analysis of market cycles.

Of course, both platforms also have flaws, from paid video forecasts to biased moderators inside communities. Yet this is where the crypto industry gets something it badly lacks on other social networks: institutional memory, deep arguments, and a hard stress test for scams.

Nostr, Farcaster, and Lens: Social networks without intermediaries

The most interesting front is unfolding not among the giants, but inside decentralized protocols. Nostr, Farcaster, and Lens are not trying to compete with Facebook for reach. They are testing another model: what happens if users own not only cryptocurrency, but also their own account and audience?

Nostr is probably closest to the philosophy of Bitcoin. It is an open protocol without servers or directors, where the user is identified by a public key and messages are transmitted through independent relays. Jack Dorsey once believed in this architecture because he saw it as a remedy against censorship on Web2 platforms.

Farcaster and Lens are integrated even more deeply into the Web3 ecosystem. Their goal is to make profiles, followers, and reputation portable. If a traditional social network can ban an account or cut its reach at any moment, then in a decentralized model, users own their data and can move it to another application in one click.

For now, this is still a niche market. But it is here that the architecture is being built for a world where the rules of the game are defined by code, not corporations.

The future lies beyond corporate algorithms

The media space no longer belongs to any single player. It functions as a distributed system: the signal is born on X, the community acts in Telegram, and deeper analysis passes through Reddit and YouTube. Major platforms such as Meta and TikTok will remain on the sidelines of this process. They are optimized for passive consumption, while the new financial toolkit, now fully integrated into the traditional economy, requires instant action.

That is why Zuckerberg and ByteDance are losing this battle to Musk and Durov. While traditional corporations are trying to protect their billion-user reach from regulatory pressure, outdated Web2 algorithms simply cannot keep up with reality. The industry does not need platforms where users are merely allowed to watch videos or write posts about digital assets. It needs platforms that become financial infrastructure themselves.

Musk is systematically building X into a super app, while Durov has turned chats into a banking ecosystem. The most important media resource of the future will not necessarily be the one with the largest number of profiles. It will be the space that gives users real control over capital and ownership — everything the old world still considers “too risky.”

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.