Dmytro Kharkov

Crypto taxes vs. stocks: Same capital gains rates, but very different real-world costs

Crypto taxes vs. stocks: Same capital gains rates, but very different real-world costs
Crypto taxes vs. stocks.

​The IRS’s classification of cryptocurrency as property has kept long-term capital gains rates equal to those on stocks at 0%, 15%, or 20% (with short-term gains taxed as ordinary income up to 37%) after years of regulatory uncertainty. The rollout of Form 1099-DA reporting now tests whether greater transparency will improve compliance and close gaps.

Capital gains rates

Long-term holdings of more than one year in either crypto or stocks qualify for the same preferential federal rates. They refer to 0% for taxable income up to $49,450 for single filers or $98,900 for married couples filing jointly; 15% through approximately $545,500 single or $613,700 joint; and 20% above those thresholds. Short-term gains are subject to ordinary income brackets up to 37%. High earners in both cases should also pay the 3.8% net investment income tax if adjusted gross income exceeds $200,000 single or $250,000 joint.

“When it comes to capital gains, there is no difference in taxes between Bitcoin gains and stock gains,” said Shehan Chandrasekera, CPA and head of tax strategy at CoinTracker. 

Cryptocurrencies are treated as property under IRS Notice 2014-21. Therefore, investment holdings are analyzed through the same capital-gains framework as stocks and securities. Passive buy-and-hold strategies generate almost identical outcomes on pure appreciation.

Taxable events multiply

The practical divergence starts with the number of transactions that trigger tax. Selling a stock for cash is a clear taxable event, while qualified dividends may be taxed at preferential rates of 0% to 20%. In contrast, every crypto-to-crypto swap, purchase made with digital assets, or DeFi transaction counts as a disposition.  

Staking rewards, mining proceeds, and airdrops are treated as ordinary income at the fair-market value on the day of receipt. Active traders and yield-seeking investors therefore face a higher effective tax rate and greater record-keeping demands. For this reason, specialized software has become highly popular nowadays.

Wash sale rules diverge

One of the clearest advantages for direct crypto holdings is the absence of the wash-sale rule. Section 1091 disallows losses on stocks or securities when an identical position is reacquired within a 30-day window. As the IRS classifies spot cryptocurrency as property rather than a security, that restriction does not apply.

“Bitcoin offers a significant advantage when it comes to harvesting losses because it is treated as ‘property’ and not subject to the wash sale rule like stocks and securities,” Chandrasekera noted. 
David Canedo, CPA and institutional tax reporting lead at CoinTracker, explains the difference: “Under existing U.S. tax rules, the wash sale rule does not apply to cryptocurrencies… the IRS currently classifies digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum as property, not securities.” 

Investors can sell at a loss and repurchase immediately and still claim the deduction (this is impossible for equities). Spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs, however, are still subject to the full regime. Proposed legislation advancing in Congress may close this gap.

Reporting requirements expand

Transparency has increased sharply in both fields. Brokers must report gross proceeds from digital-asset sales on Form 1099-DA for transactions occurring in 2025 and later. Moreover, cost-basis information will be collected for covered assets from 2026 onward. In this way, the government tries to close the enforcement gap.

Stocks have operated under comprehensive 1099-B reporting for many years. Crypto’s new forms have similarities with stocks but introduce some challenges regarding wallet-by-wallet basis tracking. Taxpayers who previously treated crypto as lightly monitored now now have to consider the risks of raising compliance costs, especially for multi-platform activity.

Investor implications remain mixed

For long-term holders, the tax differences have narrowed. Capital-gains rates are the same, reporting is converging, and the overall framework is similar now. Active participants and those generating staking or DeFi yields confront higher ordinary-income exposure and more frequent taxable events. The wash-sale exemption remains an important advantage, though its durability is uncertain.

International data show a high variety of legislative approaches in the world. Thus, India’s flat 30% tax on crypto gains with limited loss offsets is very different from preferential equity treatment there. U.S. investors operate under a relatively moderate regime but should pay closer attention to the details. As Form 1099-DA data flows, the relative tax efficiency of crypto versus stocks may be subject to change.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.