Dmytro Kharkov

How German metalworkers’ strikes are testing Europe’s industrial strength

How German metalworkers’ strikes are testing Europe’s industrial strength
IG Metall strikes challenge Germany’s industrial competitiveness

​German metalworkers began strikes on November 1, 2026, as IG Metall demands a 5% pay rise for 3.7 million employees. The union’s industrial strength may force concessions, but they will squeeze profit margins even further. Can Germany’s metal and electrical industry absorb higher labor costs without experiencing a large-scale crisis?

The scale of the dispute

The metal and electrical (M+E) sector plays a key role in Germany’s industrial complex. It employs nearly 4 million people and generates turnover of €1.3–1.4 trillion annually. It also supplies a substantial share of manufacturing value added and exports (more than half of sector sales often go abroad). Key sub-sectors include automotive, mechanical engineering, electronics, and metals.

Warning actions began at Thyssenkrupp’s Rasselstein tinplate plant, RF 360/Qualcomm in Munich as well as casting and rolling operations. The union plans to expand strikes to more than 2,000 companies. Inflation remains around 2.5–3%, many people face real wage losses, according to union members. Employers do not want to accept their requests due to high energy costs, weak demand, and the need to halt “deindustrialization.”

Pressure on Germany’s core industry

The automotive sector in Germany already cuts capacity and jobs, but it experiences even higher threats. Production utilization at many plants is 60%, well below the 75–80% needed for profitability. Analysts expect about 200,000 fewer automotive jobs by 2030. Chinese manufacturers effectively utilize a 30% cost advantage on vehicle production.

Therefore, higher labor costs may negatively affect German industries’ competitive positions. German manufacturing labor costs equal to €45–55 per hour that are higher than many EU countries and the U.S. in some spheres. Prolonged strikes may disrupt just-in-time supply chains and raise short-term output losses. They can accelerate decisions on short-time work and relocation. Private consumption would benefit from stronger real wages, but only in case firms remain able to maintain the current level of employment.

European supply-chain consequences

Disruptions in German auto components, machinery, and electronics affect assembly plants and suppliers in Central and Eastern Europe, France, Italy, Spain, etc. Many EU equipment producers rely on German intermediate goods. A wave of German strikes creates the risks of delayed deliveries and higher inventories. So temporary production pauses are possible across the single market.

Considerable German unit labor costs influence relative competitiveness inside the euro area. If German wages rise without proportional productivity gains, other EU locations with lower costs will become more attractive for investment. At the same time, weaker German industrial demand reduces orders for EU suppliers. This can negatively affect eurozone manufacturing PMIs. The conflict refers to balancing between the protection of purchasing power in Europe’s largest economy and stimulating exports.

Global competitive and geopolitical effects

Beyond Europe, the situation affects global supply chains and the competition with China. Extended disruptions may force buyers to diversify toward Asian or North American sources. This will accelerate existing trends in this sphere. China’s cost advantages and state support pressure European producers in electric vehicles and components. So higher European labor costs may widen that gap, and no clear response strategy has been offered.

Hyperscalers and industrial firms investing in electrification and defense also monitor German negotiations. Some investors may prefer to shift capital expenditure toward more stable or lower-cost jurisdictions. Conversely, a settlement that preserves purchasing power and maintains competitiveness will support domestic and international demand.

Paths forward and systemic risks

While the situation remains problematic, several scenarios are possible. A moderate compromise may be reached. Past German bargaining conflicts have often ended in deals that balance wage gains with opportunities for struggling firms. However, the current environment is characterized by overcapacity in traditional auto, energy-cost disadvantages, and technological change. IG Metall’s Nadine Boguslawski has argued that the employers’ offer “amounts to a pay cut for workers and a lasting weakening of the economy.” She claims that “without purchasing power, there can be no strong economy.” Employers reply that further cost increases will lead to more job losses and plant closures.

If strikes escalate, short-term output losses in Germany will increase even further through European and global supply chains. If the eventual deal pushes labor costs higher, the longer-term threats include deindustrialization and reduced investments. The outcome will show whether Europe’s major industrial economy can overcome this challenge and remain competitive in the global world. However, the current period of uncertainty may last for several months, thus making its successful resolution more difficult for all parties involved in the process.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.