Senate Republicans drop White House ballroom funding from immigration bill
Senate Republicans are removing up to $1 billion in security funding tied to President Donald Trump’s proposed White House ballroom from a revised immigration enforcement bill. The change reflects concerns that the provision could complicate passage of the broader measure as Republicans try to move it through reconciliation rules in the Senate.
Highlights
- Senate Republicans removed White House ballroom and related Secret Service funding from the immigration bill, responding to internal debate and electoral optics.
- The revision aims to meet budget reconciliation rules after the Senate parliamentarian ruled the security funding violated the Byrd Rule in May.
- Democrats could have challenged the provision, raising the vote threshold, but Republicans now seek to advance the package with their 53 votes under reconciliation.
Senate revision reshapes funding package
As first reported by CNBC, the revised bill released Wednesday by the Senate Judiciary Committee excludes funding that had been sought for the ballroom project and related Secret Service needs after weeks of internal Republican debate.Republican lawmakers have worried the proposal could weaken the immigration package politically and procedurally. Some senators have also feared the funding would make the party appear out of touch with voters facing high living costs ahead of the November midterm elections.
Trump has personally pressed lawmakers to approve the funding. Administration officials have argued the request is necessary after the alleged April 25 assassination attempt against Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner at the Washington Hilton, and they have said only about $200 million of the total would have gone to the ballroom, with the rest supporting other Secret Service upgrades.
Reconciliation rules drive legislative risk
Republicans are trying to pass the measure through reconciliation, a process that allows budget-related legislation to clear the Senate with a simple majority rather than 60 votes. With 53 Republican senators, the party is seeking a path that avoids procedural setbacks in a chamber where Democrats and two independents aligned with them can still shape the outcome of disputed provisions.In May, the Senate parliamentarian ruled that an earlier version including ballroom security funding could not move through reconciliation because it failed the Byrd Rule, which bars provisions deemed extraneous to federal spending or outside committee jurisdiction. Had the language remained, Democrats were likely to challenge it and force Republicans to meet a higher vote threshold.
The White House is rejecting the idea that Republicans voluntarily abandoned the provision, saying the language was removed because of the parliamentarian's ruling. Still, Senate Majority Leader John Thune said last month that Republicans would try to rewrite the measure to keep the funding while complying with Senate rules, underscoring how difficult it is to preserve contested items in a larger border enforcement package.
Our earlier article on the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Secure America Act proposal explained how the measure aimed to fully fund key border and immigration enforcement agencies, including CBP and ICE, through fiscal 2029. It highlighted the shift toward multi-year funding to reduce disruption from annual appropriations fights and to support longer-term staffing, procurement, and enforcement planning across DHS operations.
Latest Legislation News
- Forex
- Crypto