Nike exits the S&P 100 as declining market value increases pressure
Nike will be removed from the S&P 100 on September 21 after being part of the leading U.S. blue-chip index for nearly two decades. The company remains in the S&P 500, but its shares at a 12-year low and a sharp decline in market capitalization highlight its operational and competitive pressures.
Highlights
- Nike shares closed at a 12-year low of $38.40 on September 4, while market capitalization fell from $264 billion in 2021 to $57 billion.
- Its exit from the S&P 100 was driven by management's short-term decisions, a data-centric strategy, and the neglect of retail partnerships and brand-building.
- Annual revenue in China fell to $5.85 billion, market share was lost, and the company is in the process of reducing inventory and restructuring strategic partnerships.
This article was translated from the original. Read the original version by our correspondent here.
Reasons for the index exit
According to Forbes India, Nike's exit from the S&P 100 is not the result of a single event, but rather signals the simultaneous emergence of several strategic weaknesses. The company's shares closed at $38.40 on September 4, their lowest level in nearly 12 years. Over the past year, the share price has nearly halved, while it has fallen 76% over five years. The company's market capitalization has declined from around $264 billion at the end of 2021 to approximately $57 billion.Nike has not issued a separate direct statement on the setback, but in its recent financial report and earnings commentary, CEO Elliot Hill said the company continues to face top-line pressure, although progress in performance products has been encouraging. He emphasized improved profitability, consistent execution, and scaling successful initiatives.
Technology marketing executive Gregory Kennedy, who specializes in brand and communications strategy, says Nike's problems lie more in management decisions than in its products. According to him, the company focused too heavily on data, short-term financial metrics, and direct-to-consumer sales, while neglecting creativity, brand-building, and traditional retail partnerships. Nike's growing reliance on its own website, app, and stores has created room for rivals such as Hoka and On in categories like running.
Other reactions also suggest that reducing the influence of specialized product teams, limiting relationships with retail partners, and shifting marketing spending toward digital performance campaigns may have delivered short-term efficiency, but weakened understanding of customer demand and retail presence. U.S. entrepreneur Benny Johnson also said that the company's decline reflects its growing distance from its customers.
Business impact in China and India
China remains a major pressure point for Nike. By the end of fiscal 2026, the company's annual revenue in the region had fallen to $5.85 billion, showing that the brand is losing both market share and cultural relevance there. Chinese consumers are increasingly turning to Anta, Li-Ning, and other local sportswear brands, putting further pressure on Nike's former growth engine.In 2025-26, the company has begun working to reduce inventory, rebuild retail partnerships, and refresh its product pipeline, but China and weak consumer demand remain major challenges. Despite this, Nike remains a major player in the global sportswear market and a constituent of the S&P 500.
In India, Nike entered in 1995 through a licensing arrangement and established its local entity, Nike India Private Limited, in 2004. The company has expanded beyond running to build a presence in football, basketball, fitness, and lifestyle categories. More recently, it has reshaped its digital strategy in India, making Nykaa a strategic digital commerce partner in February 2026. Under this arrangement, Nykaa manages Nike's India website and app operations, fulfillment, customer experience, and digital marketing, while Nike products are also available through Nykaa Fashion.
Our previous report highlighted the recent strength of the S&P 500 (SPX), where the index was trading above key moving averages and supported by large institutional inflows. The article mentioned a new ETF from State Street Investment Management with $2.5 billion in initial capital, which could influence near-term price direction and ranges by increasing passive buying in the S&P 500.