Trump says U.S. will stop Israel aid after year-end in shift for bilateral security ties
With U.S. voters heading to the polls in midterm elections, President Donald Trump says Washington will end its annual funding for Israel after this year while continuing weapons sales to the country. The announcement signals a potential change in a long-standing security arrangement as support for aid to Israel weakens among parts of the U.S. electorate.
Highlights
- Trump announces on Election Day that U.S. will stop approximately $4 billion in annual Israel aid after 2024, despite existing agreements through 2028.
- Quinnipiac University poll in June shows 48% of U.S. voters and 66% of Democrats think the U.S. is too supportive of Israel, up sharply since 2017.
- Analysts see Trump's declaration as an attempt to influence U.S. electoral politics amid Republican concerns about losing the House and Senate uncertainty.
Election-day announcement raises questions over aid timeline
As reported by BusinessWorld Online, citing Reuters, Trump says he has made a deal with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop the roughly $4 billion a year in U.S. funding to Israel after the end of this year, although he gives no details on how the move would be implemented.The current Memorandum of Understanding provides $3.8 billion in U.S. military aid to Israel each year and does not expire until September 2028. Trump says Israel no longer needs the funding and frames the decision as a way to remove a political issue that Democrats have used against Republicans over military assistance.
Discussions are already under way on how Washington's support for Israel would evolve beyond 2028, and Netanyahu has previously said he expects U.S. aid to wind down over time. Trump nevertheless suggests his position is settled even as the U.S. and Israel remain in conflict with Iran more than eight months after their joint attack on the Islamic Republic.
Neither the White House nor Netanyahu's office responds to requests for comment. In Israel, political uncertainty adds another layer after the October 27 election leaves Netanyahu without a governing majority while also denying rivals a clear route to replace him.
Political fallout builds in U.S. and Israel
Trump links the decision directly to domestic political pressure, arguing that financial support for Israel has become an easy target for left-wing Democrats and specifically referring to Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan. He says the funding has been used as a "bad talking point" even though, in his view, Israel does not need the money.Public opinion data in the U.S. points to a broader erosion in support, particularly since the Gaza war. A Quinnipiac University poll in June finds that 48% of voters and 66% of Democrats believe the U.S. is too supportive of Israel, up sharply from 2017 levels when the question was first asked.
That shift is also feeding into electoral politics as candidates critical of Israel win Democratic primaries and more moderate lawmakers show greater willingness to challenge longstanding U.S. policy. Analysts cited in the report suggest Trump's declaration is timed to influence Election Day politics as Republicans face the risk of losing control of the House of Representatives, while the Senate remains uncertain.
In Israel, opposition figure Gadi Eisenkot criticizes the reported change in strategic ties, saying on X that learning of such a move through the media underscores the risks of Netanyahu's conduct. At the same time, some members of Trump's Make America Great Again movement are also becoming more critical of Israel, arguing the conflict with Iran has pulled the president deeper into a foreign confrontation that many Americans oppose.
In our earlier article on the IMF’s warning about the Middle East war’s economic fallout, we highlighted how renewed disruptions to energy production, shipping routes, and critical infrastructure could intensify volatility across the region. The IMF projected a contraction in 2026 followed by an uneven rebound, while stressing that regional buffers are thinning and policymakers need stronger fiscal and price-stability defenses as risks persist.