The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Vincent Geloso questions the significance of the International Monetary Fund’s growth forecasts. He suggests their reliability is not particularly strong, especially when considered at the regional level.
Geloso further notes that the forecasts could be accurate or inaccurate, ultimately arguing that their overall meaning is minimal based on current information.
Geloso has previously discussed research on Britain's fiscal austerity in the 1930s and the role of the construction sector. He has also publicly disputed findings from a Journal of Finance study on social security and wealth inequality. His recent comments on IMF forecasts mark another instance where he questions established economic metrics.