The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Donald Trump promised to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve in the United States. The crypto industry believed this would mark a new stage in the development of digital assets. But now it looks as if Trump’s main crypto promise may never be fulfilled.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s plan to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve has run into an unexpected problem. According to Bloomberg, the U.S. administration is now discussing whether the Treasury Department can legally manage such a reserve.
Initially, the reserve was expected to be based on bitcoin that the government had already obtained through various forfeitures. But in practice, everything turned out to be more complicated. Questions have emerged inside the administration not only about the Treasury’s authority, but also about the very idea of holding bitcoin indefinitely. For the government, this is an unusual asset: its price changes sharply, while the rules for managing such reserves are still not clearly defined.
Against this backdrop, officials are discussing an option under which the reserve could be managed not by the Treasury, but by the Commerce Department. The White House is not publicly abandoning the idea, but acknowledges that the structure of such a treasury is still being worked out.
Creating a Bitcoin reserve was one of Trump’s loudest promises to the crypto industry. During the election campaign, he regularly addressed the crypto community and promised to change Washington’s attitude toward digital assets. Trump spoke not just about easing rules, but about making the U.S. a global crypto hub.
The strategic Bitcoin reserve became the main symbol of this policy. For cryptocurrency supporters, it was more than just a campaign promise. If the government recognizes bitcoin as a reserve asset, it means that bitcoin finally moves beyond the status of a speculative instrument and becomes part of major financial policy.
The crypto industry believed the politician’s words. Companies, investors and lobbyists actively supported Trump, expecting that his victory would open a new political cycle for the market. In a tense campaign, this support became an important factor: the crypto community helped make digital assets part of the broader election agenda, while bitcoin became one of the symbols of Trump’s fight for the White House.
There was a long distance between the campaign promise and a real state reserve. After his victory, Trump did sign an order creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve, but the document did not launch large-scale government purchases of bitcoin.
The meaning of the order was different. The U.S. was not supposed to buy BTC on the market, but to gather into a separate reserve the coins that were already held by the government after criminal and civil forfeitures. In other words, Washington was effectively supposed to change its approach to existing assets: instead of selling them, as often happened before, it would hold them in a long-term reserve.
But this is where the main weakness of the whole structure appeared. A presidential order is not an act of Congress. It can set direction for agencies, but it does not give the project the same stable legal basis as a full law. Therefore, a future administration could theoretically cancel or revise this policy.
That is why the crypto industry was waiting not only for the order, but also for the next step. For the Bitcoin reserve to become a real government program, it must be written into law, with clear rules for management, custody and possible expansion.
According to Arkham estimates, the U.S. government controls more than 328,000 BTC. This makes it the largest government holder of bitcoin in the world. Most of these assets came not from purchases, but from major forfeitures linked to Silk Road, Bitfinex Hack Recovery and other investigations.
But owning bitcoin and having a full strategic reserve are not the same thing. A reserve requires a clear management system: who is responsible for the assets, where they are stored, how audits are conducted, whether they can be moved and what happens when the administration changes. Until these questions are resolved, bitcoin will remain a set of forfeited assets.
This is where Trump’s promise collides with reality. For the crypto market, the very idea of a reserve looked like historic recognition of bitcoin at the state level. But for Washington, it is a legal, financial and political problem that cannot be solved with one loud statement.
So the main risk now is not that the U.S. does not own bitcoin at all. The risk is different: the country may never turn these holdings into a real strategic reserve. In that case, one of Trump’s loudest crypto promises will remain not a new era for digital assets, but an example of how quickly a campaign slogan loses force when it collides with bureaucracy.