The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Michael Shermer, a prominent science writer, raises questions about the standard of evidence provided in recent claims regarding the discovery of a new species.
In a tweet directed at Ryan UFOs, Shermer draws a comparison, suggesting that blurry photographs, grainy videos, and anecdotal eyewitness accounts would not suffice as scientific proof for the discovery of a new bipedal primate species such as the Yeti. He implies that the scientific community would require much more robust evidence to support such claims. His skepticism highlights the importance of rigorous scientific standards in extraordinary claims.
Shermer’s insistence on higher evidentiary standards in scientific discourse reflects broader concerns he has raised about the balance between skepticism and freedom of expression. His critique closely mirrors positions outlined in his examination of the implications of social media scrutiny in cases like the UK's controversial arrest over X post, highlighting the ongoing debate over credibility, transparency, and open dialogue in both science and society.