The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Renowned economist Ricardo Reis has put a spotlight on the omission of significant economic models from the Nobel Prize list. He suggests that key models, including those involved in IO demand-estimation-merger-analysis, have been influential in policy and debate yet remain unrecognized.
Reis's commentary highlights a gap between academic contributions and their recognition at the highest levels. The oversight brings into question the selection criteria for the prestigious award, urging a reevaluation of how impactful work is acknowledged by Nobel committees.
Reis's perspective on the Nobel's recognition criteria aligns with his previous assessment of the prize's emphasis on the macro-growth subfield, as seen in his analysis of the Nobel prize signals strong focus on macro-growth. Additionally, these concerns mirror the broader challenges facing the financial sector, a topic Reis explored through his discussion of US banks borrowing $15.1bn from the Fed amid repo market strains, underscoring the interplay between academic research and practical financial stability.