Barclays faces U.S. congressional scrutiny over Staley-Epstein investigation
Barclays is facing renewed pressure from U.S. lawmakers over how it examined former chief executive Jes Staley's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and what its board knew about the matter. The inquiry adds to governance concerns around the bank's response to earlier regulatory findings in the UK and its handling of Staley's departure.
Highlights
- Senator Warren and Representatives Khanna and Krishnamoorthi sent a letter to Barclays Chairman Nigel Higgins demanding details on the Staley-Epstein investigation.
- Lawmakers cited the UK FCA's December 2023 enforcement action against Staley, noting the lifetime ban from UK financial sector senior roles upheld in July 2025 and fine reduced to 1.1 million pounds.
- Concerns raised about Barclays allowing Staley to resign in November 2021 with a 12-month compensation package and the implications for the bank's U.S. $200 billion asset footprint.
Lawmakers seek details on Barclays review
As reported by U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, citing a press release from the committee, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Representative Ro Khanna and Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi sent a letter to Barclays Chairman Nigel Higgins seeking more information on the bank's investigation into Staley's professional and personal ties to Epstein.The lawmakers said Barclays told UK financial regulators in October 2019 that Staley had confirmed he did not have a close relationship with Epstein, but argued that later reporting shows otherwise. In their letter, they said it remains unclear how the bank, while supposedly examining the connection, failed to uncover what they described as a relationship spanning nearly two decades, including during Staley's time at Barclays.
The letter recounts that Staley and Epstein first met in the late 1990s when Epstein was a client of JPMorgan and remained close after Epstein's 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a child. The lawmakers also cited reports that the two exchanged more than 1,200 messages between 2008 and 2012, that Staley visited Epstein's Little Saint James island and traveled on Epstein's private jet, and that Epstein later tried to help Staley secure the top job at Barclays.
Governance and regulatory risks in focus
Lawmakers tied their questions to Barclays' broader governance and accountability, pointing to the UK Financial Conduct Authority's December 2023 enforcement action that found Staley recklessly misled the regulator and acted without integrity. They noted that the lifetime ban from senior roles in the UK financial sector was upheld in July 2025, although the fine was reduced to 1.1 million pounds from 1.8 million pounds.The letter also criticizes Barclays for allowing Staley to resign in November 2021 rather than dismissing him, saying the arrangement let him continue collecting compensation and contractual benefits for another 12 months. According to the lawmakers, that departure package could cover the reduced regulatory fine more than twice over.
Their message also highlights Barclays' U.S. footprint, including about $200 billion in assets held through Barclays US LLC. They said access to U.S. bank charters and licenses depends on the character and fitness of management and on a firm's ability to operate in a safe and sound manner, framing the issue as relevant beyond the bank's UK oversight.
Our earlier coverage of Unilever’s proposed merger with McCormick focused on how an antitrust consultation by the UK Competition and Markets Authority intensified regulatory scrutiny and weighed on investor sentiment. The article also noted that uncertainty was compounded by weak technical signals, with shares trading below key moving averages and traders watching near-term support and resistance levels closely.
Latest Company News News
- Forex
- Crypto