The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
A prolonged wave of attacks is unfolding across multiple EVM-compatible networks, with hackers draining hundreds of crypto wallets by prioritizing scale over high-value targets. According to on-chain investigator ZachXBT, more than $107,000 has already been stolen, while the root cause of the exploit remains unidentified.
Unlike traditional hacks that typically focus on wallets holding large sums, this campaign is reportedly aimed at accounts with relatively small balances — most often under $2,000. This approach allows attackers to stay under the radar: individual losses appear manageable, and some victims may not react immediately, especially if the wallet is rarely used.
However, the mass nature of the attacks offsets the low average take per wallet. Over time, such operations generate significant cumulative damage and create a toxic backdrop for the market: users grow increasingly wary of self-custodied crypto storage, while activity across dApps and the DeFi ecosystem may decline.
ZachXBT reports that total user losses have already exceeded $107,000 and continue to rise.
View post on X Loading...
At the same time, the exact attack vector has yet to be confirmed. It remains unclear whether the exploit involves malicious scripts, phishing, compromised browser extensions, seed phrase leaks, transaction signature manipulation, or a vulnerability in some part of the broader infrastructure.
A key concern is that unresolved attacks often carry significant scaling potential. If the vulnerability turns out to be systemic — for example, affecting widely used browser components, frontends, or supply chains — the number of affected users could increase sharply.
Damage distribution data points to a concentration across three major EVM ecosystems. Ethereum accounts for 51% of total losses, followed by BNB Chain at 24% and Base at 8%. The remaining stolen funds are spread across other EVM-compatible networks.
This geographic spread suggests the issue is not limited to a single chain. Instead, attackers appear to be operating where user density, liquidity, and recurring wallet–dApp interaction patterns are highest.
The wallet drainer segment — schemes in which users are tricked into signing malicious transactions or have their key data compromised — continues to evolve. Tactics are becoming more precise and less visible: instead of headline-grabbing hacks involving millions of dollars, attackers increasingly favor large-scale campaigns targeting wallets with modest balances. This reduces media attention and increases the likelihood that the attack can persist longer.
For users, this represents a shift in the threat model. Even small wallets and secondary addresses can no longer be considered safe simply because they hold limited funds.
Earlier, we reported that 2025 became a record year for crypto thefts and detailed what hackers stole and in what amounts.