The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Prediction markets are moving from the fringes of finance into the center of the macro conversation, after new Federal Reserve research highlighted their ability to track economic expectations in real time.
A working paper from Fed-affiliated researchers argues that Kalshi, a CFTC-regulated prediction-market venue, can provide faster and in some cases more accurate signals than traditional benchmarks such as surveys and interest-rate futures.
The paper, titled “Kalshi and the Rise of Macro Markets,” evaluates how well Kalshi’s market-implied probabilities forecast key U.S. outcomes, including inflation prints, unemployment, GDP and Federal Open Market Committee decisions. The authors describe a central problem for policymakers: “Managing expectations is central to modern macroeconomic policy. Yet the tools that are often relied upon — surveys and financial derivatives — have many drawbacks,” adding that Kalshi can capture the market’s “beliefs directly and in real time.”
Their core finding is that Kalshi’s prices can be converted into continuously updating probability distributions, rather than a single point forecast. “Kalshi markets provide a high-frequency, continuously updated, distributionally rich benchmark that is valuable to both researchers and policymakers,” the paper says.
In practical terms, the researchers argue Kalshi’s contracts can be used to infer the likelihood of different rate outcomes at specific Fed meetings—something they say is harder to extract cleanly from other instruments. “Overall, we argue that Kalshi should be used to provide risk-neutral [probability density functions] concerning FOMC decisions at specific meetings,” they wrote, adding that a common benchmark is “too far removed from the monetary policy interest rate decision.”
Kalshi is also being pitched as a way to observe how expectations react to headlines intraday, not just over weeks. That “rich intraday dynamics” is presented as an advantage for central banks trying to assess whether official communication is landing as intended.
The paper’s release also arrives as prediction markets face renewed legal and political scrutiny. Kalshi has fought state-level challenges over whether some event contracts resemble gambling, even as it operates under federal oversight.
The findings quickly sparked commentary across finance and crypto circles. Veteran trader Peter Brandt said, “Fire all Fed PhD’s and let Kalshi set the US interest rate.”
The Fed paper frames Kalshi as a potential upgrade to how macro expectations are measured, emphasizing speed, continuous updates and probability distributions. The debate now shifts to whether regulators and policymakers will treat prediction-market signals as an input alongside surveys and traditional derivatives. Even if the research is only “preliminary,” it strengthens the case that real-money forecasts may matter more in the next phase of macro monitoring.
Read also: Bitcoin falls to $66,000 amid mixed Fed outlook on interest rates