PEI Licensing takes Pudgy Penguins to court over trademark
Pudgy Penguins NFT has become the center of a legal dispute after being accused of trademark infringement. PEI Licensing, the owner of the Penguin clothing brand, filed a lawsuit claiming that Pudgy Penguins encroached on its business in the production of plush toys and apparel.
Highlights
- Pudgy Penguins NFT faces a trademark lawsuit from PEI Licensing over toys and apparel.
- Plush toy sales alone generated $13 million, with total 2025 revenue potentially reaching $50 million.
- Legal precedent exists for NFTs, but this case involves virtual-to-physical market expansion, making it unique.
De-virtualization of NFTs
The lawsuit stems from Pudgy Penguins selling over 1 million plush toys and launching a clothing line sold alongside NFTs, integrating them into the company’s commercial strategy.
PEI Licensing, which owns the Penguin brand founded in 1955, claims that it sent a cease-and-desist letter to Pudgy Penguins in October 2023, which was allegedly ignored, allowing production to continue and reducing the value of the Penguin brand.
“The defendant knew or should have known that unauthorized use of our trademarks would cause harm through deception, omission, or practices likely to mislead consumers, creating the false impression of affiliation with PEI,” stated Penguin’s legal team.
PEI is now seeking monetary compensation, including all profits from the disputed sales, and requests a jury trial. If successful, the company could claim a significant payout.
Only plush toy sales through major retailers generated over $13 million in revenue for Pudgy Penguins. Considering other physical products, revenue in 2025 could reach $50 million, excluding an additional $10 million from licensed merchandise.
NFTs at the center of legal disputes
Legal precedents already exist where NFTs were the subject of high-profile lawsuits.
Hermès vs. Mason Rothschild: Hermès sued over the MetaBirkins NFT collection, depicting Birkin bags with added virtual fur. The court ruled that the NFTs infringed Hermès trademarks and created consumer confusion, marking one of the first applications of trademark law to digital assets.
Nike vs. StockX: Nike sued an online retailer selling NFTs featuring Nike sneakers. The case was eventually settled confidentially.
However, in the PEI vs. Pudgy Penguins case, the virtual brand expanded into the physical world, inadvertently capturing part of the market from a traditional consumer goods manufacturer — a legal scenario that appears unprecedented.
As we wrote, Buying pressure lifts Pudgy Penguins higher in today trading
- Forex
- Crypto