EU crypto rules leave offshore derivatives gap as MiCA crackdown nears

Traders Union
All News
Crypto
EU crypto rules and MiCA gap

Highlights

EU's July 1 MiCA deadline targets unauthorized spot crypto providers but leaves perpetual futures and other derivatives outside its regulatory scope.
Perpetual futures constitute about 80% of crypto trading volume, allowing offshore platforms like Hyperliquid and Aster to offer leverage up to 200x to EU users without MiCA authorization.
Retail investor losses remain high—according to ESMA data, 74% to 89% of CFD accounts lose money—while unregulated offshore derivatives create both protection risks and competitive disadvantages for licensed EU firms.

MiCA deadline leaves derivatives outside scope

As argued in an opinion column published by CoinDesk, the EU’s July 1 deadline for unauthorized crypto asset service providers to wind down operations applies to spot trading, but not to crypto derivatives. That means platforms offering perpetual futures can remain accessible to European users even as regulators tighten oversight of unlicensed spot venues.

The article says perpetual futures account for roughly 80% of crypto trading volume, citing Glassnode data. It adds that these products function much like contracts for difference, letting traders post margin and take leveraged exposure to prices without owning the underlying assets.

ESMA said in a February statement that derivatives marketed as perpetual futures are likely to fall under existing product-intervention measures on contracts for difference if they meet the CFD definition. In that case, the same restrictions apply, including leverage caps, risk warnings, margin close-out rules, negative balance protection and a ban on trading incentives.

Investor risks and competitive imbalance

A European investor can still access offshore platforms offering far higher leverage than is typically allowed under EU investor-protection rules, the article argues. It cites Hyperliquid offering bitcoin exposure with 50x leverage and Aster offering up to 200x leverage, while saying neither platform is authorized under MiCA or the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive for EU derivatives activity.

The argument draws on ESMA and national regulator data reviewed in 2018, which found that 74% to 89% of retail CFD accounts lost money across EU jurisdictions, with average client losses ranging from 1,600 euros to 29,000 euros. The opinion piece says research on crypto perpetual futures shows similar retail loss patterns, with most accounts losing money and a notable share of capital fully wiped out.

The article contends this creates both an investor-protection problem and an uneven competitive landscape for licensed European providers, which must bear compliance and user-protection costs that offshore rivals avoid. It says the next major test for European regulators is whether they will enforce derivatives rules against offshore crypto platforms as firmly as they are now moving against unlicensed spot exchanges.

Our earlier article on London’s Pisces platform covered how the London Stock Exchange Group is rolling out intermittent trading for private company shares, with autonomous-vehicle start-up Wayve set to run an $85 million employee tender as a first major test. We noted the UK government’s push to use Pisces to deepen domestic capital markets and keep fast-growing companies anchored to London by offering controlled liquidity without a full IPO.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.