Senate crypto bill talks keep blockchain developer protections in focus

Traders Union
All News
Crypto
Senate crypto bill developer protections

Highlights

Sen. Ron Wyden urges Senate leaders to preserve Section 604, the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, which clarifies non-custodial developers are not money transmitters.
Section 604 has strong support from the crypto industry for providing legal certainty, but faces opposition from law enforcement groups concerned it may weaken anti-trafficking safeguards.
The dispute over the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act remains unresolved in the Clarity Act debate as lawmakers face a tight legislative timeline before August recess and November elections.

Wyden presses leaders on Section 604

As first reported by The Block, Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden is urging Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer to preserve Section 604, known as the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, in future versions of the broader Clarity Act.

In a letter sent this week, Wyden says the measure would create a safe harbor for non-custodial developers by clarifying they are not money transmitters. He argues that smart policy can support law enforcement while also allowing innovation to continue, and he urges Senate leadership to keep the language in any legislative package.

The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act is a standalone bill that has been folded into the Clarity Act and has become a major sticking point as lawmakers work through broader crypto legislation. Sen. Cynthia Lummis introduced the bill earlier this year, and Wyden is its only cosponsor.

Industry backing meets law enforcement concerns

Supporters across the crypto industry say the provision would give software developers needed legal certainty and help prevent innovation from moving offshore. Wyden says the section would align policy from the Department of Justice and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, while focusing enforcement resources on bad actors running unlicensed money transmission businesses.

He also says the proposal includes an exception so non-custodial developers are not protected if they are found to be transferring or using funds tied to illicit activity. Opponents, including some law enforcement groups and Catholic leaders, warn the language could weaken anti-trafficking safeguards and complicate investigations.

The dispute over BRCA remains one of the largest unresolved issues in the Senate's work on the Clarity Act. Another open question is whether lawmakers should add stronger ethics guardrails for members of Congress and executive branch officials, including President Donald Trump, with ties to the digital asset industry, as the legislative calendar tightens before lawmakers leave Washington in August and with November elections approaching.

In our earlier article on the prediction-markets regulatory clash, we covered a Manhattan federal judge’s decision refusing to block New York from enforcing its gambling laws against Kalshi’s sports-event contracts. We also noted the broader jurisdictional fight between state authorities and the CFTC, as New York and other states move against event-contract platforms while companies argue federal commodities law should control.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.