U.S. Senate Democrats intensify opposition to Clarity Act as ethics dispute threatens crypto bill

Traders Union
All News
Crypto
Senate blocks crypto bill

Highlights

Senate Democrats Chris Murphy, Chris Van Hollen, and Jeff Merkley threaten to block the Clarity Act unless it bans senior officials from crypto involvement.
No compromise exists on ethics provisions as supporters face a tight deadline to revise the Clarity Act and gather Democratic votes before summer recess.
Trump’s $1 billion in crypto profits disclosed for 2025 fuels opposition, shifting legislative risk toward ethics concerns over market structure issues.

Ethics provision becomes central to Senate negotiations

As reported by CoinDesk, three U.S. Senate Democrats, Chris Murphy, Chris Van Hollen and Jeff Merkley, use a Capitol Hill press conference to harden opposition to the crypto market structure bill unless it directly addresses what they call corruption tied to Trump's personal crypto profits.

The lawmakers argue that the unresolved sticking point is a provision that would bar senior government officials, including the president, from personal involvement in the crypto industry. Democrats involved in negotiations and on the Senate Banking Committee have said they cannot support the Clarity Act without that language, even though some previously voted for the measure in committee.

Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, calls the Clarity Act a "corrupt piece of legislation that will do a lot of harm." Murphy says the bill is worthless if it does not stop what he describes as Trump's corruption of the industry, and he argues it is remarkable the legislation has advanced this far without fully separating Trump and his family from crypto entanglements.

Political risk grows for crypto legislation

The measure now faces a narrowing window for passage as supporters try to produce a new draft in the coming days and secure enough Democratic votes before lawmakers leave for the summer recess and attention shifts to the fall midterm elections. So far, there is no sign of a compromise that satisfies both sides and the White House.

Trump's recent financial disclosures, including revelations that he made more than $1 billion from crypto efforts in 2025, give opponents additional ammunition as they try to block or reshape the bill. The dispute highlights how ethics concerns, rather than market structure alone, are becoming a decisive factor for the digital asset sector's push for federal legislation in the U.S.

Our earlier article on June U.S. inflation highlighted that price pressures continued to outpace real wage growth for a third straight month, squeezing household budgets as food and utility costs rose. It also noted how the inflation debate has become increasingly political, with lawmakers linking cost-of-living strains and economic management to the Trump agenda.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.