Why would JPMorgan need a stablecoin?

Traders Union
All News
Editors' Picks
JPMorgan need a stablecoin?

What could a stablecoin do that JPM Coin cannot?

JPM Coin and a stablecoin may look similar. Both put dollars on a blockchain and can enable payments around the clock, but there is an important difference in what those digital dollars represent.

JPM Coin is a tokenized deposit. The money remains a deposit at JPMorgan, with the token providing a way to move and settle it onchain. JPMorgan launched the dollar-denominated token on Coinbase's Base network in 2025 and plans to extend it to the Canton Network.

Stablecoins are designed to circulate more freely. They can move between wallets, exchanges and applications across public blockchain networks rather than remaining within one bank's deposit system. For JPMorgan, that could provide access to parts of the blockchain economy that JPM Coin does not currently reach.

JPMorgan has been moving deeper into blockchain

JPMorgan began building blockchain infrastructure more than a decade ago, introduced JPM Coin in 2019 and later brought its blockchain businesses together under Kinexys. What began largely inside controlled institutional networks has gradually moved closer to public blockchain markets.

That shift has accelerated. JPM Coin is now available on Base, while Kinexys also supports tokenized funds and other assets across public and private networks. The bank is increasingly connecting conventional financial products with infrastructure that was once largely associated with crypto.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has nevertheless questioned why customers need stablecoins when other payment options already exist. Speaking last year, he also acknowledged that the bank could not ignore fintech companies competing in payments, accounts and rewards.

“The way to be cognizant is to be involved,” Dimon said. “We're going to be in it and learning a lot.”

Stablecoins are becoming harder for banks to ignore

One important change has come from regulation. The GENIUS Act, signed into law in 2025, created a federal framework for payment stablecoins, including requirements for issuers to maintain reserves backing the tokens they issue.

Banks still have reasons to be wary. Stablecoins can compete not only for payment activity but also for deposits, particularly if customers are offered rewards for holding them on crypto platforms. That issue has become one of the main points of disagreement between banks and the crypto industry during this year's debate over the CLARITY Act.

Dimon joined that fight in May, arguing that crypto companies should not be able to offer products resembling interest-bearing deposits without comparable protections. At the same time, JPMorgan was considering whether it might eventually issue a stablecoin of its own.

Competition is also spreading beyond the largest stablecoin issuers. Payment companies, asset managers and other financial groups are exploring how stablecoins could fit into their businesses, bringing more traditional finance companies into blockchain-based payments and digital dollars.

Banks are preparing for both outcomes

JPMorgan is not alone. More than a dozen financial institutions, including Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Santander, are moving forward with a global stablecoin venture initially focused on the dollar, with the euro and potentially other G7 currencies to follow.

The shift reaches smaller lenders too. This week, 39 state banking associations announced the BankChain Alliance, an industry-owned blockchain network planned for 2027 that could support stablecoins alongside tokenized deposits, automated settlement and other banking services.

Stablecoins and tokenized deposits may coexist

Tokenized deposits already solve many of the problems banks are trying to address. They can move around the clock, support programmable payments and settle transactions onchain while remaining commercial bank money. JPMorgan itself presents JPM Coin as an alternative to stablecoins for institutional clients.

Stablecoins have an advantage elsewhere. They are widely used in crypto markets and increasingly in cross-border payments, where their ability to move between platforms and counterparties can matter more than maintaining a conventional bank deposit. Tokenized deposits remain more concentrated in corporate treasury management and transactions involving customers of the same bank or banking network.

Businesses may eventually want elements of both. An EY-Parthenon survey found that 68% of nonfinancial companies surveyed would prefer a bank to issue the stablecoin they use, while 63% would prefer to access stablecoin services through their existing banking relationships.

The distinction between the two sides is also becoming less clear. Crypto companies are seeking bank-like regulatory status just as banks move further onto public blockchains.

Stablecoins began as a way to move digital dollars without relying on traditional banks. JPMorgan's deliberations point to a different possibility: if customers increasingly want dollars that can move across blockchains, banks may decide they want to issue those dollars themselves.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.