Yulia Slavina

OKX-ICE tokenized stock plan draws broader issuer pushback before SEC response deadline

OKX-ICE tokenized stock plan draws broader issuer pushback before SEC response deadline
Issuers push back on tokenization

Issuer resistance is intensifying as OKX and Intercontinental Exchange move toward launching a blockchain-based venue for tokenized U.S. shares. Amazon, Tesla, SpaceX, Netflix, SoFi Technologies and Lam Research are the latest companies to object, taking disclosed opposition to 56 names and leaving only 13 of the initial 62 selections without a public objection.

Highlights

  • Amazon, Tesla, SpaceX, Netflix, SoFi Technologies and Lam Research joined objections to OKX-ICE's tokenized stock venue, raising total objectors to 56 as of Nov. 2.
  • Of 62 initially targeted companies, 49 (79%) have now objected before the SEC's 30-day response deadline expiring Nov. 3 for early recipients, reflecting broad issuer skepticism.
  • OKXICE seeks to offer 24/7 tokenized U.S. share trading under the SEC's five-year innovation exemption, but significant issuer opposition clouds the platform's near-term launch prospects.

Objections expand as filing deadline nears

As first reported by CoinDesk, the latest updated public notice dated Monday, Nov. 2 adds Amazon, Tesla, SpaceX, Netflix, SoFi Technologies and Lam Research to the list of companies rejecting participation in the OKX-ICE structure.

Amazon, Tesla and SpaceX join a growing group of issuers opposing the tokenized stock trading venue being developed by crypto exchange OKX and NYSE parent Intercontinental Exchange. The six newly disclosed objections raise the total to 56 from 50 in Friday’s update.

Of the 62 companies initially proposed for trading, 49 have now objected, or about 79%, based on the figures cited in the report. Another seven objecting companies were not part of that original group, underscoring the breadth of issuer caution as the venture approaches key response dates.

Under SEC rules, companies have 30 days after receiving written notice from a venue to object. For issuers that received notice on Oct. 4, when OKXICE published its initial filing, that window expires on Tuesday, Nov. 3, although the timeline runs from each company’s receipt of individual notice rather than from a single universal deadline.

Venues such as OKXICE can take up to five business days to publish objections, meaning additional responses may still appear after Tuesday. As of Monday’s notice, the companies from the initial selection without a disclosed objection are Apple, Strategy, Robinhood, Coinbase, Super Micro Computer, Palantir, Circle, ServiceNow, GE Vernova, Boeing, Home Depot, Securitize and BitGo.

Market structure test faces issuer skepticism

The joint venture plans to offer round-the-clock trading in tokenized versions of U.S. shares on a blockchain-based marketplace, with transactions settled using stablecoins. The platform would operate under the SEC’s five-year innovation exemption, which allows qualifying venues to use automated market makers rather than traditional order-book matching between buyers and sellers.

The level of opposition highlights how carefully public companies are weighing the implications of trading outside established equity market channels. While backers of tokenization argue that longer trading hours and faster settlement could widen access and improve efficiency, issuers are still assessing whether such markets would bring meaningful new investor demand and how separate tokenized trading could influence their listed shares.

Andrew Cuomo, OKXICE’s co-chairman and former New York governor, said during a Friday press conference that many companies want to see how the market works before joining. He also said companies outside the initial selection have approached the venture about participating, but he did not identify them, give a count, announce a launch date or say how many stocks will be available when trading begins.

In our earlier article on Musk’s pledge that SpaceX would reimburse users for financial losses caused by Grok during purchases, we noted that the scope of the guarantee remained unclear even as AI agents increasingly handle transactions. We also pointed out that most major AI developers’ terms generally place transaction liability on users, underscoring growing concerns about responsibility and safeguards when new tech intermediates financial activity.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.