The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Tracking criminals on the blockchain used to be a long and exhausting process, where every new wallet could lead an investigation into a dead end. Today, this work is increasingly taken over by artificial intelligence: it quickly pieces together fragmented transfers, turning them into a coherent picture. And this is changing not only investigative methods, but also the rules of the game for the entire crypto market.
The situation began to change with the emergence of clearer rules. The US, Europe, and Asian countries tightened requirements for exchanges, introduced KYC, and implemented monitoring of suspicious transactions. At the same time, blockchain analytics tools evolved, learning to cluster addresses, track fund flows, and link them to real-world services.
As a result, a system long considered practically anonymous is turning into one of the most transparent financial infrastructures. Blockchain has always been a public ledger. Now these traces can also be quickly read, correlated, and attributed.
Companies like Elliptic, Chainalysis, and later TRM Labs began building platforms that collect data from multiple blockchains, cluster addresses, track fund flows, and flag risky activity. Importantly, these solutions were never aimed at retail users, but at large clients — government agencies, law enforcement, banks, and crypto exchanges.
Exchanges use such systems to screen transactions and clients, banks to avoid dealing with “dirty” funds, and government agencies for investigations and sanctions enforcement.
Notably, their effectiveness was quickly proven in practice. These tools have been used in investigations of large-scale money laundering schemes, shutdowns of illegal services, and tracking transactions linked to sanctioned jurisdictions.
These approaches addressed the market’s core problem — data volume. When dealing with billions of transactions and complex routes across multiple networks, a human simply cannot process all the information quickly. That is why analysts increasingly relied on models capable of identifying patterns in massive datasets and uncovering connections invisible to manual analysis. In 2024, Elliptic reported a new study based on nearly 200 million Bitcoin transactions, where a model was trained to detect not only individual suspicious wallets but entire money laundering schemes.
Over time, the role of these systems expanded. They began not only to flag risks, but also to help structure investigations: tracking fund flows, suggesting possible links between addresses, and reducing analysis time. Elliptic explicitly stated that such models helped uncover new laundering schemes and previously unknown illicit wallets, with the results already being used to improve their products.
In effect, AI became an “invisible layer” within analytics platforms. But even with these capabilities, a key limitation remained: the system assisted analysts but could not fully replace their work.
In practice, this changes how blockchain data is handled. A user formulates a query in natural language, and the system independently selects relevant data, builds the analytical logic, and produces an answer. Chainalysis emphasizes that such solutions rely on billions of transactions and millions of prior investigations — effectively working on an accumulated knowledge base of typical fund flows, risks, and schemes.
The key shift is that the analyst’s role is beginning to change. Previously, a human conducted the investigation end-to-end, while the system only accelerated отдельных этапов. Now, the machine can trace fund routes, structure facts, and compile them into a report for further verification. According to the company, in some cases this already reduces complex investigations from days to minutes.
At the same time, the barrier to entry is changing, as access to analytics gradually expands — not only for narrow specialists and large players, but also for a broader range of market participants who can formulate queries and receive ready-made insights.
In effect, the market is moving from tools that simply accelerate analysis to systems that take over part of the thinking in the process.
This means that risk data turns into a competitive advantage. Those who detect problematic routes earlier are less likely to lose time to delays, face blocks, or deal with failed settlements. The analysis of fund origin is gradually becoming as integral to trading infrastructure as fees or execution speed.
For the legitimate market, this is largely good news: more predictability, fewer toxic funds, and higher trust from traditional finance. For those operating in gray zones — the opposite. But the key point is different: a market that built its reputation on opacity is becoming increasingly indistinguishable from traditional financial infrastructure. And that may be the most important consequence — not for regulators, but for the crypto market itself.