Paramount-WBD merger faces court pause as antitrust challenge threatens closing timeline

Paramount-WBD merger faces court pause as antitrust challenge threatens closing timeline
Merger faces legal setback

A California court order is slowing a planned media consolidation that companies have been preparing to close within days. The 14-day pause raises the risk of added transaction costs for Paramount if litigation extends beyond the current timetable.

Highlights

  • California District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín issues a 14-day temporary restraining order halting the proposed $110 billion Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger after arguments from state attorneys general.
  • Paramount faces a ticking fee of 25 cents per quarter for Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders—about $650 million quarterly—if the deal closes after September 30, plus a $7 billion breakup fee if blocked by regulators.
  • U.S. Department of Justice clears the merger in June, but antitrust lawsuits led by California and pending reviews in the EU and UK pose significant timing and regulatory risks to deal completion.

Court order pauses merger process

As first reported by CNBC, a California judge grants a temporary restraining order that pauses further action on the proposed Paramount-WBD merger for 14 days. California District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín signs the order on Monday after hearing arguments from both sides in Oakland on Friday.

The lawsuit is brought by a group of state attorneys general led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who seek to block the $110 billion deal on antitrust grounds. The transaction would combine Paramount and Warner Bros. film studios, the CBS broadcast network, cable assets including CNN, TNT, MTV and BET, and streaming platforms Paramount+ and HBO Max under one company.

Jeffrey Kessler, Paramount's lead trial counsel, says on CNBC that the restraining order comes after Paramount signals it intends to close the transaction as early as July 22, when it expects to have all regulatory clearances. The states could seek another temporary restraining order after the 14 days or pursue a preliminary injunction, which would delay the deal further.

Costs and market impact of a longer delay

The merger is under review by the European Union and the UK, which sets a new provisional deadline of July 22. The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division clears the tie-up in June, and the deal also wins approval in several other jurisdictions, while Paramount says it remains on track to close by the end of September.

If closing slips beyond Sept. 30, Paramount could incur a ticking fee of 25 cents per quarter for Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders, equal to about $650 million in cash value each quarter until completion. Paramount also agrees to a $7 billion breakup fee if the deal does not move forward because of regulatory concerns.

Bonta calls the merger unlawful and says it would lead to higher prices, lower quality and less content for film and television audiences across the U.S. The states argue the combined company would control nearly one-third of films and nearly one-third of basic cable television programming, while Paramount says in court filings that the challenge is weak and that the merger would support investment, stabilize cable television and increase theatrical releases.

We previously reported on the court order that temporarily halted Paramount’s planned $110 billion deal involving Warner Bros. Discovery as a multistate antitrust lawsuit moved forward. The states argued the merger could reduce competition in film and TV, enable industry-wide price increases, and trigger hard-to-reverse steps such as job cuts and sensitive information sharing if the transaction proceeded.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.