The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Preston Byrne argues against the rationale for banning a protest in London, questioning the lack of public safety concerns.
He highlights that the protest, while illegal under English law, has been treated differently compared to other rampant property crimes in the city.
Byrne's stance on the protest ban reflects his broader skepticism toward legislative measures that impinge on civil liberties without clear public benefit—a perspective consistent with his prior critique that the UK Online Safety Act contradicts the US constitution. His continued advocacy for legal reform amid changing law enforcement underscores the ongoing debate over proportionality and fairness in the application of English law.