The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Dario Perkins, a well-known economist, cautions on the potential inverse outcomes of economists' written appeals. He suggests that whenever large numbers of economists come together to draft a letter, the outcome is often contrary to their predictions.
This phenomenon has been observed in various historical instances where consensus letters by economists did not achieve the intended economic impacts. Perkins' statement underscores the complexities and unpredictability in economic forecasting.
Perkins’ skepticism regarding the efficacy of economists' consensus statements complements his prior reflections on shifting policy priorities, particularly as he considered whether the so-called ‘77 thing’ signals a renewed inflation focus over traditional employment objectives. His observations also align with earlier analyses suggesting that, amid evolving market conditions, there remains potential for renewed optimism within the UK economy, despite broader financial uncertainties.