CFTC proposes Rule 40.11 overhaul for prediction markets oversight

Traders Union
All News
Regulators News
CFTC Rule 40.11 overhaul

Highlights

The CFTC proposes amendments to Rule 40.11 to clarify criteria for event contracts, targeting conflicts, terrorism, assassination, and certain gaming contracts as contrary to public interest.
The proposed rule overhaul aims to provide regulatory clarity for prediction markets, addressing public policy risks and responding to thousands of public comments on the need for more predictable standards.
The commission warns that insufficient oversight could push prediction market activity offshore, threatening transparency and market integrity, while emphasizing broad definitions to prevent exploitation by informed actors.

Rule changes target modern event contracts

As outlined by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the proposed amendments to Rule 40.11 are meant to clarify when an event contract involves activities that could be deemed contrary to the public interest. The commission says the changes would set clearer criteria for applying its review powers and better align the rule with modern prediction markets and congressional intent.

The proposal interprets war, terrorism and assassination broadly. Under the plan, war covers belligerent military activity beyond formally declared conflicts; terrorism includes physical and non-physical attacks such as cyberattacks, whether inside or outside the U.S.; and assassination includes any intentional killing of an individual.

The agency also proposes identifying gaming-related contract categories that it says carry heightened public policy risks. Those include player-injury contracts, officiating and altercation contracts, pre-collegiate sports contracts and casino-style games of chance.

The commission frames the overhaul as part of a wider rulemaking effort after receiving thousands of public comments on whether new or revised event-contract rules are needed. It says the current framework has lacked clarity and that more predictable standards are needed for market participants.

Regulatory clarity seen as central to U.S. market leadership

The op-ed argues that clearer rules can help keep prediction-market innovation under federal supervision rather than pushing activity to offshore platforms outside the CFTC's remit. That risk, the commission says, raises broader concerns about transparency, accountability and market integrity as event contracts gain traction.

The agency contends that broad definitions are necessary because the public often cannot reliably assess the likelihood of events involving national security or violence, while people with privileged information could have incentives to profit. It also warns that bad actors may try to manipulate contract prices to send misleading signals to the public or government agencies, and that uncertain facts during such events can complicate contract resolution.

The CFTC presents prediction markets as a growing information tool that can aggregate views on future events faster than conventional forecasting methods. In that context, the commission says its role is to support responsible financial innovation while maintaining safeguards for the derivatives sector.

Our earlier coverage of the debate over a potential SpaceX IPO described growing pressure on the SEC to scrutinize valuation assumptions and investor-protection risks tied to the company’s governance, including dual-class control mechanisms. We also noted broader market-structure concerns, such as the possibility that index inclusion could push passive investors into exposure without an active choice.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.