The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
tweet_author, industry influencer, points to Norway's sovereign wealth fund policy of keeping domestic allocation at zero, stating this rule is intended to prevent market distortion driven by political decisions.
According to tweet_author, previous issues involving CIB and BDC illustrate the potential risks of subsidizing domestic markets through such funds. The message emphasizes a choice between achieving returns or using capital for domestic market support, but not both.
Recent commentary from Kevin Bryan has addressed related topics. Bryan previously discussed student debt at graduation being higher in Denmark, Norway, the UK, Finland, Australia, and the Netherlands than in the U.S. in a country comparison article. He also examined expectations for moderate AI development by 2030 and the potential for 0.5–1% extra GDP growth in a separate analysis.