The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued guidance on how federal securities laws apply to certain crypto assets and crypto-related activities. The document suggests that most crypto assets will not be classified as securities.
One of the key priorities for the new leadership of the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is to define digital assets and clarify the division of regulatory oversight. Under the previous U.S. administration, the SEC played the dominant role in regulating cryptocurrencies. Now, however, the initiative appears to be shifting toward the CFTC.
SEC Chair Paul Atkins stated that the previous administration failed to acknowledge that most crypto assets are not securities in themselves and that investment contracts can be terminated. This stance led to numerous lawsuits and allegations of unregistered securities offerings, resulting in halted large-scale projects, major legal disputes, and operational restrictions for crypto companies in the United States.
Among the most notable cases were those involving Ripple, Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance, where crypto trading was treated as an unregistered securities offering. Other prominent cases include Telegram and Block.one, where the SEC blocked fundraising through ICOs.
According to the newly published guidance, which is supported by the CFTC leadership, “only one class of crypto assets remains subject to securities laws” — namely, tokenized traditional securities.
The full guidance will be published on SEC.gov and in the Federal Register. Market participants — from innovators and issuers to individual investors — are encouraged to review it to better understand the regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC.
For now, the document serves as an important bridge between years of regulatory uncertainty and the bipartisan Clarity Act on market structure, currently under development in Congress and expected to be adopted in the near future.
The guidance can be seen as a significant signal of a shift in U.S. regulatory policy toward greater clarity and predictability for the crypto market. The effective acknowledgment that most crypto assets are not securities reduces regulatory risks for projects and investors that have faced aggressive enforcement in recent years.
At the same time, the redistribution of authority toward the CFTC may indicate a transition to a more “commodity-based” model of crypto regulation, potentially simplifying product launches and encouraging greater institutional participation.
If закрепed in the upcoming Clarity Act, this approach could provide the long-awaited regulatory framework needed to accelerate industry growth in the United States and strengthen its global competitiveness.
As we wrote, SEC and CFTC prepare joint approach to regulating U.S. crypto market