U.S. crypto bill faces compliance and ethics gaps before Senate vote

Traders Union
All News
Crypto News
U.S. crypto bill compliance gaps

Highlights

The U.S. crypto bill advanced from the Senate Banking Committee on May 14 with unresolved gaps in DeFi oversight, anti-money laundering, and stablecoin controls.
Current bill language permits platforms and actors to evade U.S. scrutiny by operating offshore, exemplified by a Justice Department case involving $1 billion laundered by a Venezuelan national.
Critics highlight absent ethics provisions as the bill does not prohibit officials or immediate family from engaging in digital asset ventures while in office, raising market integrity concerns.

Five regulatory weaknesses under debate

As argued in a commentary published by CoinDesk, the bill clears the Senate Banking Committee on May 14 and advances with what the author describes as five unresolved weaknesses in its compliance structure.

The first concerns decentralized finance platforms, with the argument that intermediaries moving or concealing value should not avoid oversight by labeling themselves decentralized. The critique points to Treasury findings that Tornado Cash was used to launder more than $455 million stolen by the Lazarus Group, while U.N. experts report another $147.5 million later moved through the same platform.

A second issue centers on what the piece calls the Tornado Cash loophole, where anti-money laundering obligations apply to a person but not to software performing the same function. The article also cites a May warning from FinCEN that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps builds a multi-jurisdictional shadow banking network using digital asset infrastructure, front companies and exchange houses to launder oil proceeds and finance weapons procurement and terrorism.

The analysis also flags stablecoins, arguing that the earlier GENIUS Act framework for issuers still allows illicit actors to move funds through DeFi protocols, offshore platforms and mixers with limited controls. It says sanctioned Russian entities already use stablecoins through platforms that impose no identity verification requirements, and calls for ecosystem-wide monitoring and suspicious activity reporting by issuers.

Potential impact on enforcement and market credibility

The commentary says the bill also leaves a jurisdictional gap by allowing platforms serving American customers or routing activity through the U.S. financial system to reduce scrutiny by locating headquarters abroad. It points to a recent Justice Department case against a Venezuelan national accused of laundering about $1 billion through a network involving bank accounts, crypto exchange accounts, private wallets, shell companies and transactions moving into and out of the United States.

A fifth concern is ethics oversight. The piece cites a reported deal involving a member of President Trump's immediate family and crypto venture World Liberty Financial, and argues that officials and their immediate family members should be barred from owning, promoting, sponsoring, endorsing or soliciting investment in digital asset ventures while the official is in office.

More broadly, the argument reflects a growing policy debate over whether U.S. crypto legislation can support market development while preserving anti-money laundering controls, sanctions enforcement and public trust. As the Senate considers the measure, the critique says the choice is no longer whether to regulate digital assets, but whether the final rules are strong enough to protect consumers, national security and the integrity of public office.

Our previous report on Chinese money laundering networks detailed a House subcommittee hearing on how these groups help drug cartels move illicit proceeds through the U.S. financial system. The article highlighted FinCEN’s estimate of $312 billion in suspicious activity tied to cartel-linked networks from 2020 to 2024 and reviewed recent enforcement actions and potential legislative steps to disrupt these flows.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.