The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
David Bailey draws attention to the support for BIP-54, highlighting that it already has 42 times more hashrate backing it than BIP-110.
He questions the rationale of using a 55% activation threshold, implying that such a threshold may be risky given the current level of support.
Bailey has previously said that proposed changes such as BIP-110 require consensus among network participants, otherwise no protocol adjustment occurs, according to a recent article. He also characterized the failed BIP-110 takeover as positive for Bitcoin, referencing a prolonged campaign by a major developer in a separate report. These statements illustrate his ongoing focus on hashrate support and consensus in protocol changes.