The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Amid growing global interest in digital assets, the creation of a national Bitcoin reserve may seem like a step into the future — a signal that the state recognizes the legitimacy of cryptocurrencies and is preparing for a new economic era. But is there any real benefit for the average person? How do government-held bitcoins affect the lives of people who don’t trade crypto, don’t read white papers, and don’t keep seed phrases under their pillows?
At first glance — they don’t. The case of El Salvador, a pioneer of this approach, illustrates it clearly. In 2021, President Nayib Bukele declared Bitcoin legal tender alongside the U.S. dollar. The country launched the Chivo Wallet app and gave every citizen $30 in BTC. It seemed like a first step toward financial inclusion. But several years later, there’s been little noticeable impact on the everyday economy.
An October survey of Salvadorans found that 92% do not use Bitcoin for transactions — even more than in 2023, when 88% said they didn’t use it.
According to Quentin Ehrenmann, general manager of the non-profit initiative My First Bitcoin, El Salvador’s government scaled back its involvement in crypto-related projects after signing an agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Public education campaigns disappeared entirely.
“Since the government entered into this contract with the IMF, Bitcoin is no longer legal tender, and we haven't seen any other effort to educate people. The government, apparently, continues to accumulate Bitcoin, which is beneficial for the government — it's not directly good for the people.”
Despite ongoing BTC accumulation, the country’s crypto strategy resembles a speculative state fund more than a tool for economic modernization. Citizens have no direct access to or interaction with these assets. The IMF has explicitly noted that new Bitcoin purchases are no longer part of El Salvador’s official policy.
El Salvador hosted crypto conferences, launched blockchain projects, and publicly bought BTC during market dips — but none of these steps have significantly transformed the economy. Moreover, the country eventually made concessions to the IMF, which has repeatedly urged the government to abandon Bitcoin as legal tender.
Even the occasional use of the Lightning Network — such as hotel payments via IBEX Pay — doesn’t change the overall picture. A lack of public education, rollback of government programs, and the removal of BTC’s legal status have pushed mass adoption even further out of reach for ordinary Salvadorans.So if the world’s most radical crypto experiment remained little more than an image campaign, what hope is there for Bitcoin reserves to make a meaningful difference elsewhere?
A different — less public but equally ambitious — strategy is unfolding in Bhutan. This small Himalayan country of around 800,000 people has been quietly building state-supported Bitcoin mining infrastructure for several years.
The initiative is led by the government-owned investment firm Druk Holding & Investments, with mining equipment installed near hydropower stations. Unlike El Salvador, Bhutan made no dramatic announcements and didn’t alter the legal status of Bitcoin — instead, it chose a technocratic approach: integrating digital assets into its national energy economy.
Transparency remains limited — the size of Bhutan’s Bitcoin holdings has not been officially confirmed. Yet, the fact that the state is not only investing but also building infrastructure signals a deeper strategy. Here, Bitcoin is treated not as a “piggy bank,” but as a resource linked to energy policy, innovation, and sovereignty.
Despite the contrasting approaches — from El Salvador’s headline-grabbing experiment to Bhutan’s quiet technocratic push — the average citizen is left with a valid question: “What does this mean for me?” And for now, the answer remains underwhelming.
Today, national Bitcoin reserves are not integrated into social programs, pension systems, infrastructure development, or tax incentives. They don’t reduce inflation, make loans more accessible, or create jobs directly. At best, they represent a geopolitical bet on the future; at worst, they’re a symbolic gesture toward digital modernity.
Still, the potential is there. Governments that learn how to incorporate Bitcoin into real mechanisms of public welfare — such as subsidies, insurance, or education — may transform digital assets into something more than reserves. But until that happens, the benefits of a sovereign Bitcoin treasury remain largely reserved for politicians and institutional players.