U.S. crypto bill faces China competition warning as CLARITY push advances

Traders Union
All News
Crypto
U.S. crypto bill and China warning

Highlights

Senator Cynthia Lummis urges passage of the CLARITY Act to maintain U.S. leadership in digital finance amid rising global competition, especially from China.
In May, the Senate Banking Committee advanced the CLARITY Act, but opposition from traditional banks and a tight pre-election legislative calendar cast doubt on enactment before 2026.
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon opposes the bill due to unequal requirements between banks and crypto firms, criticizing provisions for crypto interest payments and looser compliance standards.

Legislative push and political timeline

As reported by Senator Cynthia Lummis in public remarks and a post on X, the Wyoming Republican says a comprehensive crypto market structure law would help ensure that other countries do not set the rules for what she describes as the next financial era. Lummis argues the U.S. built the dollar-based financial system that has supported global stability for decades, and says the CLARITY Act is needed to secure a similar role in digital finance.

In May, the Senate Banking Committee voted to advance the CLARITY Act after the measure had stalled for months, renewing industry expectations that the proposal could still become law in 2026. Even so, the bill's path remains uncertain as lawmakers face resistance from established financial interests and a shrinking legislative calendar ahead of the U.S. midterm elections.

Bank opposition and industry implications

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says banks will oppose the latest version of the legislation because it still allows crypto companies to pay interest on user deposits. He also says the current draft does not impose the same anti-money laundering and capital reserve standards on crypto firms that banks must meet.

Dimon says banks will continue to fight the bill and criticizes Coinbase and CEO Brian Armstrong over efforts to support its passage. Lummis warns that if the measure is not signed into law in 2026, another viable window for enactment may not reopen until 2030, raising the stakes for the U.S. crypto sector and for Washington's broader position in financial rule-setting.

Our earlier article on the CFTC’s approval of the first U.S.-listed perpetual bitcoin contract explained how U.S. regulators are beginning to bring popular offshore-style crypto derivatives onshore under domestic oversight. We also highlighted the rapid growth of perpetual futures on platforms like Hyperliquid and the resulting push by established exchanges and crypto firms to expand regulated offerings, alongside concerns about leverage, settlement risk, and gaps in compliance controls.

This material may contain third-party opinions, none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer. While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners.