The tweet was deleted by the author.
But we saved everything 🙂.
Over the past year, a growing number of Bitcoin mining companies have moved beyond solely mining “digital gold” in an effort to diversify how they use their infrastructure. In some cases, Bitcoin miners have stepped away from the crypto network altogether, as revenue opportunities tied to artificial intelligence have become too attractive to ignore.
The list of Bitcoin mining companies that have diversified into AI over the past year includes Applied Digital, Bit Digital, Bit Mining Ltd., Bitdeer Technologies, Bitfarms, Cango, Cipher Mining, CleanSpark, Core Scientific, Galaxy Digital, HIVE Digital Technologies, Hut 8, Iris Energy, MARA Holdings, Riot Platforms, and TeraWulf. It should be noted that the extent to which these companies have pivoted away from Bitcoin varies on a case-by-case basis. That said, AI is likely to account for the majority of revenue for many of these companies by the end of the year.
In light of all of this diversification away from Bitcoin mining, some observers have claimed that the Bitcoin network itself is facing a crisis, as a massive loss in mining power over a short period of time could cause trouble when it comes to Bitcoin’s ability to process transactions and keep new blocks flowing.
“It’s definitely a threat, and a serious one,” Charles Chong, the former director of strategy at major Bitcoin mining firm Foundry, told WIRED. “But how soon is an open question.”
On X, CNBC crypto commentator Ran Neuner took this argument to the extreme, stating, “AI has killed Bitcoin forever. It became Bitcoin mining’s biggest competitor.”
On the other hand, many people involved in the Bitcoin industry, including prominent miners themselves, have claimed these concerns are nothing more than wild hysteria, claiming the Bitcoin network is built to be resilient against large swings in the amount of computing resources pointed at it at any one time. On X, Bitcoin media outlet TFTC went as far as to claim, “Bitcoin miners are pivoting to AI hosting. Everyone thinks that's bearish. It's the opposite.”
So, who's correct? Could this pivot by miners away from Bitcoin and towards AI cause serious problems for the network?
The shift by Bitcoin miners toward AI is driven by basic economic incentives. Miners on the Bitcoin network are not necessarily altruistic actors, and the system is designed in a way to give them financial reasons to act properly and preserve the integrity of the network. For example, while some miners did try to throw their weight around during the Bitcoin block size war, the end result of that controversy was that miners eventually adopted the change users wanted (Segregated Witness) without combining it with a hard-forking increase of the block size limit because they wanted to protect the value of the very asset they mine.
The emergence of AI data centers as a new revenue source has changed the economics of Bitcoin mining businesses. Although the application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) hardware used in Bitcoin mining is not applicable to AI use cases, the rest of miners’ infrastructure and expertise remains highly relevant, particularly existing data centers with access to low-cost electricity.
If using these datacenters for AI rather than mining Bitcoin is provably more profitable, then it makes sense for existing mining specialists to pivot or at least diversify into this additional business opportunity. Notably, the recent Bitcoin price decline from $125,000 to around $66,000 has also put pressure on many miners operating at a significan loss at these levels. That said, miners who take a long-term view on Bitcoin as a global reserve asset are still hashing on the network and not selling their existing Bitcoin holdings.
In terms of what this AI pivot means for the Bitcoin network more generally, there’s no reason to be too concerned. Bitcoin’s history is filled with false predictions of its impending death due to various talking points, but it’s still producing new blocks roughly every ten minutes without any hiccups today.
Bitcoin was designed to autonomously reorganize the computing power that is directed at it on a regular basis via the difficulty adjustment algorithm, and this same dynamic that has played out repeatedly over the years will do so again with the changing economic incentives created by the AI opportunity. The fact that large Bitcoin miners are pivoting away from the network does not mean a massive amount of hashrate is going to disappear overnight. Instead, miners that are sticking with Bitcoin mining or complete newcomers will purchase that hardware and use it for their own operations. Even if the mining equipment did not find a new home, the difficulty adjustment algorithm would simply lower the hashrate needed to keep blocks rolling out at a steady pace of roughly one every ten minutes within two weeks.
As TFTC noted in their aforementioned X post, Bitcoin’s network hashrate was cut in half following the 2021 mining ban in China before eventually reaching new all-time highs less than a year later. From one perspective, Bitcoin miners diversifying into AI can be seen as a net positive, as it helps improve the profitability and stability of the companies that are tasked with operating as the accountants of the Bitcoin network.
Whether the theory of an AI-imposed Bitcoin mining death spiral is being used to promote some other crypto asset or simply grab attention on social media, the important thing to know is that this is not a serious concern. Bitcoin has adapted to changing economic realities for 17 years at this point, and it’s specifically built to keep moving along no matter what else is going on in the world.